Trial reportJAMA oncology2017
Effect of KIT and PDGFRA Mutations on Survival in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Treated With Adjuvant Imatinib: An Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00116935 (Short), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Short (12 Months) Versus Long (36 Months) Duration of Adjuvant Treatment With the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Imatinib Mesylate of Operable GIST With a High Risk of Recurrence
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Guideline
- KIT and PDGFRA Mutations and Survival of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients Treated with Adjuvant Imatinib in a Randomized Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Trial
- The prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors harboring the KIT exon 11 mutation: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of nomograms and predictive tools in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with NTRK fusion and marked response to larotrectinib in GIST with NTRK fusion: a case report.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Review
- Pelvic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Mimicking Ovarian Cancer in a Kidney-Liver Transplant Recipient Under Chronic Immunosuppression.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2026Article
- Atypical Cystic Primary Hepatic GIST: A Case Report of Rare Presentation and Long-Term Survival.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- A machine learning model integrating clinical-radiomics-deep learning features accurately predicts postoperative recurrence and metastasis of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics of progressive gastrointestinal stromal tumors and heterogeneity analyses of secondary mutations.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Spontaneous Hemoperitoneum Caused by Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Case Report.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in PDGFRA-Mutant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Aptamer-based drug delivery for targeted therapy of imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Theranostics · 2025Article
- Recent Advancement in Drug Designing as Small Molecules in Targeted Cancer Therapy: Challenges and Future Directions.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Review
- Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Advances in Treatment and Mechanism Research.Global medical genetics · 2024Review
- Article
- Molecular Profiling ofCancers · 2024Article
- Therapeutic advances of targeting receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): The First Analysis of a Mexican Population.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 16 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceLittle is known about whether the duration of adjuvant imatinib influences the prognostic significance of KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRA) mutations.
objectiveTo investigate the effect of KIT and PDGFRA mutations on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with surgery and adjuvant imatinib. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis exploratory study is based on the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group VIII/Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (SSGXVIII/AIO) multicenter clinical trial. Between February 4, 2004, and September 29, 2008, 400 patients who had undergone surgery for GISTs with a high risk of recurrence were randomized to receive adjuvant imatinib for 1 or 3 years. Of the 397 patients who provided consent, 341 (85.9%) had centrally confirmed, localized GISTs with mutation analysis for KIT and PDGFRA performed centrally using conventional sequencing. During a median follow-up of 88 months (completed December 31, 2013), 142 patients had GIST recurrence. Data of the evaluable population were analyzed February 4, 2004, through December 31, 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome was RFS. Mutations were grouped by the gene and exon. KIT exon 11 mutations were further grouped as deletion or insertion-deletion mutations, substitution mutations, insertion or duplication mutations, and mutations that involved codons 557 and/or 558.
resultsOf the 341 patients (175 men and 166 women; median age at study entry, 62 years) in the 1-year group and 60 years in the 3-year group), 274 (80.4%) had GISTs with a KIT mutation, 43 (12.6%) had GISTs that harbored a PDGFRA mutation, and 24 (7.0%) had GISTs that were wild type for these genes. PDGFRA mutations and KIT exon 11 insertion or duplication mutations were associated with favorable RFS, whereas KIT exon 9 mutations were associated with unfavorable outcome. Patients with KIT exon 11 deletion or insertion-deletion mutation had better RFS when allocated to the 3-year group compared with the 1-year group (5-year RFS, 71.0% vs 41.3%; P < .001), whereas no significant benefit from the 3-year treatment was found in the other mutational subgroups examined. KIT exon 11 deletion mutations, deletions that involved codons 557 and/or 558, and deletions that led to pTrp557_Lys558del were associated with poor RFS in the 1-year group but not in the 3-year group. Similarly, in the subset with KIT exon 11 deletion mutations, higher-than-the-median mitotic counts were associated with unfavorable RFS in the 1-year group but not in the 3-year group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with KIT exon 11 deletion mutations benefit most from the longer duration of adjuvant imatinib. The duration of adjuvant imatinib modifies the risk of GIST recurrence associated with some KIT mutations, including deletions that affect exon 11 codons 557 and/or 558.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00116935.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.