Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334284›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2017

Genomic diversity guides conservation strategies among rare terrestrial orchid species when taxonomy remains uncertain.

Collin W Ahrens, Megan A Supple, Nicola C Aitken, David J Cantrill, Justin O Borevitz, Elizabeth A James

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population Genomics of the Critically Endangered Brazilian Merganser.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Collin W AhrensRoyal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Science Division, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Megan A SuppleAustralian National University, Research School of Biology, Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Nicola C AitkenAustralian National University, Research School of Biology, Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
David J CantrillRoyal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Science Division, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Justin O BorevitzAustralian National University, Research School of Biology, Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Elizabeth A JamesRoyal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Science Division, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Species are often used as the unit for conservation, but may not be suitable for species complexes where taxa are difficult to distinguish. Under such circumstances, it may be more appropriate to consider species groups or populations as evolutionarily significant units (ESUs). A population genomic approach was employed to investigate the diversity within and among closely related species to create a more robust, lineage-specific conservation strategy for a nationally endangered terrestrial orchid and its relatives from south-eastern Australia. Methods: Four putative species were sampled from a total of 16 populations in the Victorian Volcanic Plain (VVP) bioregion and one population of a sub-alpine outgroup in south-eastern Australia. Morphological measurements were taken in situ along with leaf material for genotyping by sequencing (GBS) and microsatellite analyses. Key Results: Species could not be differentiated using morphological measurements. Microsatellite and GBS markers confirmed the outgroup as distinct, but only GBS markers provided resolution of population genetic structure. The nationally endangered Diuris basaltica was indistinguishable from two related species ( D. chryseopsis and D. behrii ), while the state-protected D. gregaria showed genomic differentiation. Conclusions: Genomic diversity identified among the four Diuris species suggests that conservation of this taxonomically complex group will be best served by considering them as one ESU rather than separately aligned with species as currently recognized. This approach will maximize evolutionary potential among all species during increased isolation and environmental change. The methods used here can be applied generally to conserve evolutionary processes for groups where taxonomic uncertainty hinders the use of species as conservation units.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenetics, PopulationGenomicsGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsOrchidaceaeSouth AustraliaDiurisgenotyping by sequencing (GBS)microsatellite markersnext-generation sequencingOrchidaceaepopulation genomics

Identifiers

PMID28334284
PMCPMC5604565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.