Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334201›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2018

Critical evaluation of bioinformatics tools for the prediction of protein crystallization propensity.

Huilin Wang, Liubin Feng, Geoffrey I Webb, Lukasz Kurgan, Jiangning Song, Donghai Lin

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. PLMC: Language Model of Protein Sequences Enhances Protein Crystallization Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Sequence-Based Prediction of Transmembrane Protein Crystallization Propensity.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Protein X-ray Crystallography and Drug Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  6. The Dundee Resource for Sequence Analysis and Structure Prediction.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huilin WangDepartment of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, China.
Liubin FengNMR Center, Xiamen University, China.
Geoffrey I WebbMonash Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia.
Lukasz KurganDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA.
Jiangning SongDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Australia.
Donghai LinDepartment of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, China.

Funding

New Tricks for 'Old' Drugs: PK/PD of Polymyxin Nonantibiotic CombinationsR01AI111965 · NIAID · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray crystallography is the main tool for structural determination of proteins. Yet, the underlying crystallization process is costly, has a high attrition rate and involves a series of trial-and-error attempts to obtain diffraction-quality crystals. The Structural Genomics Consortium aims to systematically solve representative structures of major protein-fold classes using primarily high-throughput X-ray crystallography. The attrition rate of these efforts can be improved by selection of proteins that are potentially easier to be crystallized. In this context, bioinformatics approaches have been developed to predict crystallization propensities based on protein sequences. These approaches are used to facilitate prioritization of the most promising target proteins, search for alternative structural orthologues of the target proteins and suggest designs of constructs capable of potentially enhancing the likelihood of successful crystallization. We reviewed and compared nine predictors of protein crystallization propensity. Moreover, we demonstrated that integrating selected outputs from multiple predictors as candidate input features to build the predictive model results in a significantly higher predictive performance when compared to using these predictors individually. Furthermore, we also introduced a new and accurate predictor of protein crystallization propensity, Crysf, which uses functional features extracted from UniProt as inputs. This comprehensive review will assist structural biologists in selecting the most appropriate predictor, and is also beneficial for bioinformaticians to develop a new generation of predictive algorithms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyCrystallizationCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinHumansProteinsSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID28334201
PMCPMC6171492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.