Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334033›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A qualitative study: Mothers of late preterm infants relate their experiences of community-based care.

Shahirose S Premji, Genevieve Currie, Sandra Reilly, Aliyah Dosani, Lynnette May Oliver, Abhay K Lodha, Marilyn Young

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04908332 (Effect of a Nursing Intervention on the Mother-baby Kangaroo Interaction at Home in Bogotá), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04908332 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effect of a Nursing Intervention on the Mother-baby Kangaroo Interaction at Home in Bogotá

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled68ConditionsPremature, Low Birth Weight, Mother-Infant Interaction, Gain, WeightArmsKangaroo Baby Massage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shahirose S PremjiFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0323-8009
Genevieve CurrieSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sandra ReillyFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aliyah DosaniO'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lynnette May OliverFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abhay K LodhaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marilyn YoungPrenatal and Postpartum Services, Public Health Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CAMount Royal University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Alberta, the high occurrence of late preterm infants and early hospital discharge of mother-infant dyads has implications for postpartum care in the community. Shortened hospital stay and complexities surrounding the care of biologically and developmentally immature late preterm infants heighten anxiety and fears. Our descriptive phenomenological study explores mothers' experience of caring for their late preterm infants in the community.

methodsEleven mothers were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Interview transcripts were analysed using an interpretive thematic approach.

findingsThe mothers' hospital experience informed their perspective that being a late preterm infant was not a "big deal," and they tended to treat their infant as normal. "Feeding was really problem," especially the variability in feeding effectiveness, which was not anticipated. Failing to recognize late preterm infants' feeding distress exemplified lack of knowledge of feeding cues and tendencies to either rationalize or minimize feeding concerns. Public health nurses represent a source of informational support for managing neonatal morbidities associated with being late preterm; however, maternal experiences with public health nurses varied. Some nurses used a directive style that overwhelmed certain mothers. Seeing multiple public health nurses and care providers was not always effective, given inconsistent and contradictory guidance to care. These new and changing situations increased maternal anxiety and stress and influenced maternal confidence in care. Fathers, family, and friends were important sources of emotional support.

conclusionAfter discharge, mothers report their lack of preparation to meet the special needs of their late preterm infants. Current approaches to community-based care can threaten maternal confidence in care. New models and pathways of care for late preterm infants and their families need to be responsive to the spectrum of feeding issues encountered, limit duplication of services, and ensure consistent and effective care that parents will accept.

Indexed as

Community NetworksMaternal HealthAdultAlbertaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleMaternal BehaviorMothersPostnatal CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID28334033
PMCPMC5363959
OpenAlexW2599401107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.