Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28334024›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Opposite effects of 5-HT/AKH and octopamine on the crop contractions in adult Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence of a double brain-gut serotonergic circuitry.

Paolo Solari, Nicholas Rivelli, Francescaelena De Rose, Lorenzo Picciau, Ludovico Murru, John G Stoffolano, Anna Liscia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What goes down may come up: regurgitative behaviors and their underlying gut-brain axes-insights from genetic models and related pathologies.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. eLife · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. GnRH-Related Neurohormones in the Fruit FlyInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paolo SolariDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, University Campus, S.P. 8, Monserrato (CA), Italy.
Nicholas RivelliStockbridge School of Agriculture, College of Natural Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States of America.
Francescaelena De RoseDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, University Campus, S.P. 8, Monserrato (CA), Italy.
Lorenzo PicciauDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, University Campus, S.P. 8, Monserrato (CA), Italy.
Ludovico MurruDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, University Campus, S.P. 8, Monserrato (CA), Italy.
John G StoffolanoStockbridge School of Agriculture, College of Natural Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States of America.
Anna LisciaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, University Campus, S.P. 8, Monserrato (CA), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1629-2090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study showed that in adult Drosophila melanogaster, the type of sugar-either present within the crop lumen or in the bathing solution of the crop-had no effect on crop muscle contraction. What is important, however, is the volume within the crop lumen. Electrophysiological recordings demonstrated that exogenous applications of serotonin on crop muscles increases both the amplitude and the frequency of crop contraction rate, while adipokinetic hormone mainly enhances the crop contraction frequency. Conversely, octopamine virtually silenced the overall crop activity. The present study reports for the first time an analysis of serotonin effects along the gut-brain axis in adult D. melanogaster. Injection of serotonin into the brain between the interocellar area shows that brain applications of serotonin decrease the frequency of crop activity. Based on our results, we propose that there are two different, opposite pathways for crop motility control governed by serotonin: excitatory when added in the abdomen (i.e., directly bathing the crop) and inhibitory when supplied within the brain (i.e., by injection). Finally, our results point to a double brain-gut serotonergic circuitry suggesting that not only the brain can affect gut functions, but the gut can also affect the central nervous system. On the basis of our results, and data in the literature, a possible mechanism for these two discrete serotonergic functions is suggested.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDigestive SystemDrosophila melanogasterInsect HormonesMaleMuscle ContractionOctopamineOligopeptidesPyrrolidonecarboxylic AcidSerotoninDAKH peptideInsect HormonesOctopamineOligopeptidesPyrrolidonecarboxylic AcidSerotonin

Identifiers

PMID28334024
PMCPMC5363830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.