Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333991›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus on hepatocellular carcinoma: Special emphasis from the BCLC perspective.

Yu-Wen Su, Po-Hong Liu, Chia-Yang Hsu, Yun-Hsuan Lee, Cheng-Yuan Hsia, Shu-Yein Ho, Ming-Chih Hou, Harn-Shen Chen, Teh-Ia Huo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Wen SuDepartments of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Po-Hong LiuDepartments of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Yang HsuFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yun-Hsuan LeeDepartments of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yuan HsiaFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Yein HoDepartments of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Chih HouDepartments of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Harn-Shen ChenDepartments of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Teh-Ia HuoDepartments of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with higher incidence and poorer prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The influence of DM on patient survival in different HCC stages is not known.

methodsA prospective dataset of 3,182 HCC patients was collected between 2002 and 2014. Patients were divided into three groups according to BCLC stages (BCLC stage 0 and stage A, BCLC stage B, BCLC stage C and stage D). We compared the cumulative survival rate of diabetic and non-diabetic patients in different BCLC groups. The correlation between DM and overall survival was also analyzed by multivariate Cox regression model within each group.

resultsDM is present in 25.2% of all patients. Diabetic patients had lower cumulative survival in BCLC stage 0 plus BCLC stage A group (log rank p<0.001), and BCLC stage B group (log rank p = 0.012), but not in BCLC stage C plus BCLC stage D group (log rank p = 0.132). Statistically significant differences in overall survival are found between diabetic and non-diabetic patients in BCLC stage 0 plus stage A group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.93, p = 0.013), and BCLC stage B (adjusted HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.24-2.51, p = 0.002). In contrast, the survival difference is not seen in BCLC stage C plus stage D group (adjusted HR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.90-1.30, p = 0.387).

conclusionsDM is prevalent in HCC, and is associated with lower survival rate in HCC patients with BCLC stage 0 plus stage A and B, but not in those with BCLC stage C plus stage D.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID28333991
PMCPMC5363902
OpenAlexW2601073422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.