Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Evaluation of high-resolution In Vivo MRI for longitudinal analysis of endochondral fracture healing in mice.

Melanie Haffner-Luntzer, Fabian Müller-Graf, Romano Matthys, Yvonne Hägele, Verena Fischer, René Jonas, Alireza Abaei, Florian Gebhard, Volker Rasche, Anita Ignatius

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis.Advanced healthcare materials · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Melanie Haffner-LuntzerInstitute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-2613
Fabian Müller-GrafInstitute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Romano MatthysRISystem, Davos, Switzerland.
Yvonne HägeleInstitute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Verena FischerInstitute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
René JonasInstitute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Alireza AbaeiCore Facility Small Animal MRI, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Florian GebhardDepartment of Traumatology, Hand-, Plastic-, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Volker RascheCore Facility Small Animal MRI, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Anita IgnatiusInstitute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice are extensively used for experimental bone-healing studies. However, there are few established nondestructive in vivo techniques for longitudinal fracture-healing analysis in mice, including in vivo micro-computed tomography (μCT) and radiography. Importantly, none of the established methods can discriminate between non-mineralized fibrous tissue and cartilage in the soft fracture callus. Therefore, the objective was to establish high-resolution in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the longitudinal assessment of soft callus formation during bone healing in mice. C57BL/6J mice received a femur osteotomy stabilized using an external fixator and were randomly assigned to five groups. Group 1 mice were scanned three times longitudinally during fracture healing using an optimized MRI scanning protocol to establish an algorithm to characterize the different fracture-callus tissues. Mice of groups 2-4 were scanned once on day 10, 14 or 21, respectively, euthanized after scanning and their femurs subjected to ex vivo μCT and histomorphometric analysis to compare the data assessed by MRI with μCT and histology. Control group 5 mice were not scanned. After 28 days, mice of groups 1 and 5 were euthanized and the fracture-healing outcome was evaluated by bending-test, μCT and histology to determine whether the repeated anesthesia, handling and the MRI measurements themselves influenced fracture healing. The callus-tissue values determined by MRI were mostly comparable to those obtained by μCT and histomorphometric analysis. However, at time points characterized by small relative bone or cartilage areas, MRI measurements were weakly comparable to histomorphometric data, possibly due to the inferior spatial resolution. Importantly, at the early and intermediate phases of healing, cartilage and fibrous-tissue values obtained by MRI were highly accurate. Furthermore, repeated anesthesia, handling and MRI scans did not impact bone healing. Therefore, we demonstrated the feasibility of high-resolution in vivo MRI for longitudinal assessment of soft callus formation during murine endochondral fracture healing.

Indexed as

Fracture HealingAnimalsExternal FixatorsFemoral FracturesFemurFracture FixationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID28333972
PMCPMC5363916
OpenAlexW2600829529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.