Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333948›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Epigenomic annotation of noncoding mutations identifies mutated pathways in primary liver cancer.

Rebecca F Lowdon, Ting Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca F LowdonCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Department of Genetics, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Ting WangCenter for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Department of Genetics, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-242X
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

THE WASHU TARGET ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENOMICS DATA COORDINATION CENTERU24ES026699 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2016 to 2021
$5.2M
DECODING THE IMPACT OF TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS ON GENE REGULATIONR01HG007175 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2014 to 2021
$2.7M
Connecting transposable elements and regulatory innovation using ENCODE dataU01HG009391 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, BARAK A, FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
The WashU 4DN Network Data Coordination and Integration CenterU01CA200060 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
ADVANCED EPI/GENOME BROWSER WITH ENHANCED VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS TOOLSR01HG007354 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
CHARTING THE EPIGENOMIC LANDSCAPE OF HUMAN TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTSR01ES024992 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2014 to 2015
$342k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200060NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007175NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007354NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009391NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024992NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES026699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence that noncoding mutation can result in cancer driver events is mounting. However, it is more difficult to assign molecular biological consequences to noncoding mutations than to coding mutations, and a typical cancer genome contains many more noncoding mutations than protein-coding mutations. Accordingly, parsing functional noncoding mutation signal from noise remains an important challenge. Here we use an empirical approach to identify putatively functional noncoding somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from liver cancer genomes. Annotation of candidate variants by publicly available epigenome datasets finds that 40.5% of SNVs fall in regulatory elements. When assigned to specific regulatory elements, we find that the distribution of regulatory element mutation mirrors that of nonsynonymous coding mutation, where few regulatory elements are recurrently mutated in a patient population but many are singly mutated. We find potential gain-of-binding site events among candidate SNVs, suggesting a mechanism of action for these variants. When aggregating noncoding somatic mutation in promoters, we find that genes in the ERBB signaling and MAPK signaling pathways are significantly enriched for promoter mutations. Altogether, our results suggest that functional somatic SNVs in cancer are sporadic, but occasionally occur in regulatory elements and may affect phenotype by creating binding sites for transcriptional regulators. Accordingly, we propose that noncoding mutation should be formally accounted for when determining gene- and pathway-mutation burden in cancer.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromatinGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLiver NeoplasmsModels, GeneticRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalChromatin

Identifiers

PMID28333948
PMCPMC5363827
OpenAlexW2601496941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.