Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333947›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Surgical interventions to treat humerus shaft fractures: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Jia-Guo Zhao, Jia Wang, Xiao-Hui Meng, Xian-Tie Zeng, Shi-Lian Kan

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Factors associated with humeral shaft fracture nonunion.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. In cases of humeral diaphyseal fractures, is lateral approach surgery without radial nerve exploration as effective and safe as conventional surgery?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Humerus shaft fractures, approaches and management.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Guo ZhaoDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical College of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-3988
Jia WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xiao-Hui MengDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yixing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Yixing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Xian-Tie ZengDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shi-Lian KanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Hospital · CNJiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are three main surgical techniques to treat humeral shaft fractures: open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF), intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation, and minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). We performed a network meta-analysis to compare three surgical procedures, including ORPF, IMN fixation, and MIPO, to provide the optimum treatment for humerus shaft fractures.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, and Cochrane library were researched for reports published up to May 2016. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more of the three surgical procedures, including the ORPF, IMN, and MIPO techniques, for humeral shaft fractures in adults. The methodological quality was evaluated based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We used WinBUGS1.4 to conduct this Bayesian network meta-analysis. We used the odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to calculate the dichotomous outcomes and analyzed the percentages of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve.

resultsSeventeen eligible publications reporting 16 RCTs were included in this study. Eight hundred and thirty-two participants were randomized to receive one of three surgical procedures. The results showed that shoulder impingement occurred more commonly in the IMN group than with either ORPF (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.37) or MIPO fixation (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.00-0.69). Iatrogenic radial nerve injury occurred more commonly in the ORPF group than in the MIPO group (OR, 11.09; 95% CI, 1.80-124.20). There were no significant differences among the three procedures in nonunion, delayed union, and infection.

conclusionCompared with IMN and ORPF, MIPO technique is the preferred treatment method for humeral shaft fractures.

Indexed as

AdultBone PlatesFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansHumeral FracturesMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28333947
PMCPMC5363833
OpenAlexW2602347281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.