Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333923›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Interdisciplinary approach at the primary healthcare level for Bolivian immigrants with Chagas disease in the city of São Paulo.

Maria Aparecida Shikanai Yasuda, Camila Gonçalves Sátolo, Noemia Barbosa Carvalho, Magda Maya Atala, Rosario Quiroga Ferrufino, Ruth Moreira Leite, Célia Regina Furucho, Expedito Luna, Rubens Antonio Silva, Marcia Hage and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Aparecida Shikanai YasudaDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3864-041X
Camila Gonçalves SátoloCentro de Saúde Escola Barra Funda "Alexandre Vranjac", Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Noemia Barbosa CarvalhoDivision of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Magda Maya AtalaHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosario Quiroga FerrufinoDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ruth Moreira LeiteCentro de Vigilância Epidemiológica, Coordenadoria de Controle de Doenças da Secretaria da Saúde do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Célia Regina FuruchoLaboratory of Immunology (LIM 48), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Expedito LunaTropical Medicine Institute of São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rubens Antonio SilvaSuperintendência de Controle de Endemias, Secretaria da Saúde do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcia HageLaboratory of Parasitology (LIM 46), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caroline Medeji Ramos de OliveiraLaboratory of Immunology (LIM 48), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Delatorre BusserLaboratory of Immunology (LIM 48), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vera Lucia Teixeira de FreitasDepartment of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculdade de Medicina of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Dalva Marli Valerio WanderleySuperintendência de Controle de Endemias, Secretaria da Saúde do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luzia MartinelliCentro de Saúde Escola Barra Funda "Alexandre Vranjac", Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sonia Regina AlmeidaCentro de Saúde Escola Barra Funda "Alexandre Vranjac", Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Albajar ViñasControl of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Nivaldo CarneiroCentro de Saúde Escola Barra Funda "Alexandre Vranjac", Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRSecretaria da Saúde · BRWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

methodsIn a pioneering cross-sectional study among Bolivian immigrants in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, the epidemiological profile, clinical manifestations and morbidity of Chagas disease were described. The feasibility of the management of Chagas disease at primary healthcare clinics using a biomedical and psychosocial interdisciplinary approach was also tested. Previously, a Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) infection rate of 4.4% among 633 immigrants was reported. The samples were screened using two commercial enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) tests generated with epimastigote antigens, and those with discrepant or seropositive results were analyzed by confirmatory tests: indirect immunofluorescence (IFI), TESA-blot and a commercial recombinant ELISA. PCR and blood cultures were performed in seropositive patients.

resultsThe majority of the 28 seropositive patients were women, of whom 88.89% were of child-bearing age. The predominant clinical forms of Chagas disease were the indeterminate and atypical cardiac forms. Less than 50% received the recommended antiparasitic treatment of benznidazole. An interdisciplinary team was centered on primary healthcare physicians who applied guidelines for the management of patients. Infectologists, cardiologists, pediatricians and other specialists acted as reference professionals. Confirmatory serology and molecular biology tests, as well as echocardiography, Holter and other tests, were performed for the assessment of affected organs in secondary healthcare centers. The published high performance of two commercial ELISA tests was not confirmed.

conclusionAn interdisciplinary approach including antiparasitic treatment is feasible at the primary healthcare level for the management of Chagas disease in Bolivian immigrants. The itinerant feature of immigration was associated with a lack of adherence to antiparasitic treatment and was considered a main challenge for the clinical management of this population. This approach is recommended for management of the infected population in endemic and nonendemic areas, although different strategies are needed depending on the severity of the disease and the structure of the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamAdolescentAdultBoliviaBrazilChagas DiseaseChildCross-Sectional StudiesEmigrants and ImmigrantsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNitroimidazolesbenzonidazoleNitroimidazolesTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID28333923
PMCPMC5380346
OpenAlexW2597946166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.