Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333918›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2017

21-Gene recurrence score testing among Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer in 2010-2013.

Julie A Lynch, Brygida Berse, Nicole Coomer, John Kautter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The impact of variant classification on the clinical management of hereditary cancer syndromes.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie A LynchRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0108-2127
Brygida BerseRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Nicole CoomerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
John KautterRTI International, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2530-4727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated national patient-level utilization of the 21-gene recurrence score (21-gene RS) test among Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer. We analyzed clinical, demographic, and regional factors that predict testing.

methodsUsing 2010-2013 Medicare claims, we conducted a retrospective study of breast cancer patients. The outcome variable was whether the patient underwent testing. Independent variables expected to predict testing were age, gender, race, Medicaid status, clinical characteristics, and hospital referral region (HRR).

resultsFrom 2010 to 2013, the number of test orders increased by 23.0%. Of the 256,818 patients identified in 2011-2012 claims, 25,352 (9.9%) underwent the 21-gene RS test. Estrogen receptor-positive status was the strongest positive predictor of testing (odds ratio (OR) 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.48-2.69). White patients were more likely to be tested than minorities (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.39-1.52). Secondary cancer was the strongest negative predictor. Medicaid recipients were less likely to be tested (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.78). The likelihood of testing decreased with increasing age and comorbidities.

conclusionsDespite widespread implementation of the 21-gene RS test, minorities and Medicaid recipients had less access to testing. Many patients with serious comorbidities or advanced age were tested even though the risk algorithm may not have been applicable to them.Genet Med advance online publication 23 March 2017.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsComorbidityFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic TestingHumansMedicareMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOdds RatioRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28333918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.