Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333546›Full record

Trial reportJournal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology2017

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Vortioxetine in Pediatric Patients.

Robert L Findling, Adelaide S Robb, Melissa DelBello, Michael Huss, Nora McNamara, Elias Sarkis, Russell Scheffer, Lis H Poulsen, Grace Chen, Ole Michael Lemming and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. New Somatic Treatments for Child and Adolescent Depression.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert L Findling1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland.
Adelaide S Robb2 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Health, Children's National Health Systems , Washington, District of Columbia.
Melissa DelBello3 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Michael Huss4 Universitätsmedizin , Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und -Psychotherapie, Mainz, Germany .
Nora McNamara5 University Hospitals Case Medical Center , Cleveland, Ohio.
Elias Sarkis6 Sarkis Family Psychiatry, Gainesville, Florida.
Russell Scheffer7 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Kansas School of Medicine , Wichita, Kansas.
Lis H Poulsen8 H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark .
Grace Chen9 Clinical Pharmacology, Takeda Development Center Americas , Deerfield, Illinois.
Ole Michael Lemming8 H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark .
Johan Areberg8 H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark .
Philippe Auby8 H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark .
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability of single and multiple doses of vortioxetine in children and adolescents with a depressive or anxiety disorder and to provide supportive information for appropriate dosing regimens for pediatric clinical trials.

methodsThis prospective, open-label, multinational, multisite, multiple-dose trial enrolled 48 patients (children and adolescents; 1:1 ratio) divided into 8 cohorts (4 adolescent and 4 child), with each cohort including 6 patients. The cohorts in each age group were assigned to receive one of four dosing regimens: vortioxetine 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg q.d. for 14 days. The total treatment period lasted 14-20 days with patients in the higher dose cohorts uptitrated over 2-6 days. Plasma samples for PK analysis were obtained on the first and last days of dosing.

resultsAmong children and adolescents, respectively, 62% and 92% had depression and 58% and 33% had anxiety disorder. Comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was present in 50% of children and 38% of adolescents. After 14 days q.d. at the target dose, the PK of vortioxetine concentrations was generally proportional to the dose in both age groups. Exposure, as assessed by maximum plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours, was 30%-40% lower in adolescents than in children. There was no significant relationship between sex, height, or ADHD diagnosis and PK parameters. Most adverse events were mild in severity and consistent with those seen in adults.

conclusionThe results suggest that the dosages of vortioxetine evaluated (5-20 mg q.d.; approved for treatment in adults) and the uptitration schedule used are appropriate for pediatric efficacy and safety trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnxiety DisordersAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildComorbidityDepressive DisorderDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMalePiperazinesSulfidesVortioxetineAnti-Anxiety AgentsPiperazinesSulfidesVortioxetineadolescentsadverse eventsantidepressantchildrendosingpharmacokineticsvortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID28333546
PMCPMC5568018
OpenAlexW2604009451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.