Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333533›Full record

Trial reportJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2017

A randomized clinical trial of behavioral couples therapy versus individually-based treatment for drug-abusing women.

Timothy J O'Farrell, Jeremiah A Schumm, Marie M Murphy, Patrice M Muchowski

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A randomized pilot trial of brief family-involved treatment for alcohol use disorder: Treatment engagement and outcomes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Treatment Interventions for Women With Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy J O'FarrellFamilies and Addiction Program, VA Boston Healthcare System.
Jeremiah A SchummSchool of Professional Psychology, Wright State University.
Marie M MurphyFamilies and Addiction Program, VA Boston Healthcare System.
Patrice M MuchowskiAdCare Hospital of Worcester, Inc.
Wright State University · US

Funding

Behavioral Couples Therapy for Female Drug-Abusing PatientsR01DA025618 · NIDA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI O'FARRELL, TIMOTHY JAMES · 2009 to 2013
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBehavioral couples therapy (BCT) is more efficacious than individually-based therapy (IBT) for substance and relationship outcomes among substance use disorder patients. This study compared BCT with IBT for drug-abusing women.

methodSixty-one women, mostly White, late 30s, with primary substance use disorder other than alcohol (74% opioid), and male partners were randomized to 26 sessions over 13 weeks of BCT plus 12-step-oriented IBT (i.e., BCT + IBT) or IBT. Substance-related outcomes were percentage days abstinent (PDA), percentage days drug use (PDDU), Inventory of Drug Use Consequences. Relationship outcomes were Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), days separated. Data were collected at baseline, posttreatment, and quarterly for 1-year follow-up.

resultsOn PDA, PDDU, and substance-related problems, both BCT + IBT and IBT patients showed significant (p < .01) large effect size improvements throughout 1-year follow-up (d > .8 for most time periods). BCT + IBT showed a significant (p < .001) large effect size (d = -.85) advantage versus IBT on fewer substance-related problems, while BCT + IBT and IBT did not differ on PDA or PDDU (ps > .47). On relationship outcomes, compared to IBT, BCT + IBT had significantly higher male-reported Dyadic Adjustment Scale (p < .001, d = .57) and fewer days separated (p = .01, d = -.47) throughout 1-year follow-up.

conclusionBCT + IBT for drug-abusing women was more efficacious than IBT in improving relationship satisfaction and preventing relationship breakup. On substance use and substance-related problems, women receiving both treatments substantially improved, and women receiving BCT + IBT had fewer substance-related problems than IBT. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

WomenAdultBehavior TherapyCouples TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID28333533
PMCPMC5364810
OpenAlexW2598612132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.