Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333516›Full record

Trial reportFamilies, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare2017

Collaborative mental health care for pediatric behavior disorders in primary care: Does it reduce mental health care costs?

Hao Yu, David J Kolko, Eunice Torres

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04946253 (Care Team and Practice Level Implementation Strategies to Optimize Pediatric Collaborative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04946253 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Care Team and Practice Level Implementation Strategies to Optimize Pediatric Collaborative Care: A Cluster-Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2021 to 2026Enrolled450ConditionsChild Behavior Problem, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior DisordersArmsDOCC: Evidence-based treatment for disruptive behavior and ADHD, TEAM: Implementation support strategies at the care team level following standard implementation of DOCC, Implementation support strategies at the leadership level following standard implementation of DOCC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What's known about implementing co-located paediatric integrated care: a scoping review.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hao YuRAND Corporation.
David J KolkoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Eunice TorresWestern Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

TREATING BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS IN PRIMARY CARER01MH063272 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOLKO, DAVID · 2000 to 2012
$5.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

overviewOne recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated the effectiveness of a doctor-office collaborative care (DOCC), relative to enhanced usual care (EUC), for pediatric behavior problems and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In this study, we sought to extend the literature by incorporating a cost-analysis component at the conclusion of the aforementioned trial. To our knowledge, it was the first study to examine whether the DOCC model leads to lower costs of mental health services for children.

methodFinancial records from the RCT provided cost information about all the 321 child study participants in the 6-month intervention period, and claims data from insurance plans provided cost information about community mental health services for 57 children, whose parents consented to release their claims data, in both pre- and postintervention periods. Both descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed.

resultsThe DOCC group had higher intervention costs, but the cost per patient treated in the DOCC group was lower than the EUC group during the 6-month intervention period. In terms of costs of community mental health services, although the 2 groups had similar costs in the 6 months before the RCT intervention, the DOCC group had significantly lower costs during the 6-month intervention period and 6 or 12 months after the intervention, but not in the 18 or 24 months after the intervention. DISCUSSION: The DOCC model has the potential for cost savings during the intervention period and the follow-up periods immediately after the intervention while improving clinical effectiveness. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Mental Health ServicesCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPediatricsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID28333516
PMCPMC5364816
OpenAlexW2598776441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.