Trial reportFamilies, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare2017
Collaborative mental health care for pediatric behavior disorders in primary care: Does it reduce mental health care costs?
Trial report in Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04946253 (Care Team and Practice Level Implementation Strategies to Optimize Pediatric Collaborative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Care Team and Practice Level Implementation Strategies to Optimize Pediatric Collaborative Care: A Cluster-Randomized Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Commonality of 25 component themes of integrated care for children: rapid review of 170 models.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of External Validity in Pediatric Integrated Primary Care Trials.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Collaborative Care for Comorbid Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Among Children With Behavior Problems in Pediatric Primary Care.Clinical pediatrics · 2020Trial
- Integrating youth mental health practice nurses into general practice: effects on outpatient mental health care utilization among children and adolescents.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Article
- Core Components and Implementation Determinants of Multilevel Service Delivery Frameworks Across Child Mental Health Service Settings.Administration and policy in mental health · 2024Article
- Study What You Do: Developing a Psychotherapy Tracking Database in a Large-Scale Integrated Behavioral Health Service.Annals of family medicine · 2023Article
- Care team and practice-level implementation strategies to optimize pediatric collaborative care: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type III trial.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- Pre-Implementation Organizational Environment Associated with Pediatric Integrated Care Readiness in Primary Care.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2022Article
- What's known about implementing co-located paediatric integrated care: a scoping review.International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
overviewOne recently completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated the effectiveness of a doctor-office collaborative care (DOCC), relative to enhanced usual care (EUC), for pediatric behavior problems and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In this study, we sought to extend the literature by incorporating a cost-analysis component at the conclusion of the aforementioned trial. To our knowledge, it was the first study to examine whether the DOCC model leads to lower costs of mental health services for children.
methodFinancial records from the RCT provided cost information about all the 321 child study participants in the 6-month intervention period, and claims data from insurance plans provided cost information about community mental health services for 57 children, whose parents consented to release their claims data, in both pre- and postintervention periods. Both descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed.
resultsThe DOCC group had higher intervention costs, but the cost per patient treated in the DOCC group was lower than the EUC group during the 6-month intervention period. In terms of costs of community mental health services, although the 2 groups had similar costs in the 6 months before the RCT intervention, the DOCC group had significantly lower costs during the 6-month intervention period and 6 or 12 months after the intervention, but not in the 18 or 24 months after the intervention. DISCUSSION: The DOCC model has the potential for cost savings during the intervention period and the follow-up periods immediately after the intervention while improving clinical effectiveness. (PsycINFO Database Record
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.