Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333347›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2017

Polymyxin-resistant, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is eradicated by a triple combination of agents that lack individual activity.

Justin R Lenhard, Visanu Thamlikitkul, Fernanda P Silveira, Samira M Garonzik, Xun Tao, Alan Forrest, Beom Soo Shin, Keith S Kaye, Jürgen B Bulitta, Roger L Nation and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Optimizing Treatment for Carbapenem-ResistantInfection & chemotherapy · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Justin R LenhardLaboratory for Antimicrobial Dynamics, NYS Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences and School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Visanu ThamlikitkulDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Fernanda P SilveiraDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Samira M GaronzikLaboratory for Antimicrobial Dynamics, NYS Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences and School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Xun TaoCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Alan ForrestLaboratory for Antimicrobial Dynamics, NYS Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences and School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Beom Soo ShinSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Keith S KayeDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jürgen B BulittaCenter for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Roger L NationDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jian LiDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Brian T TsujiLaboratory for Antimicrobial Dynamics, NYS Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences and School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Monash University · AUUniversity of Florida · USCalifornia Northstate University · USSiriraj Hospital · THSungkyunkwan University · KRUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USVA Western New York Healthcare System · US

Funding

Novel PK/PD Strategies for Polymyxin Combinations against Gram-negative SuperbugsR01AI111990 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JIAN, TSUJI, BRIAN · 2014 to 2018
$4.4M
Optimizing Dosing of Colistin for Infections Resistant to all Other AntibioticsR01AI070896 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SILVEIRA, FERNANDA P. · 2007 to 2011
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070896NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The emergence of polymyxin resistance threatens to leave clinicians with few options for combatting drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii . The objectives of the current investigation were to define the in vitro emergence of polymyxin resistance and identify a combination regimen capable of eradicating A. baumannii with no apparent drug susceptibilities. Methods: Two clonally related, paired, A. baumannii isolates collected from a critically ill patient who developed colistin resistance while receiving colistin methanesulfonate in a clinical population pharmacokinetic study were evaluated: an A. baumannii isolate collected before (03-149.1, polymyxin-susceptible, MIC 0.5 mg/L) and an isolate collected after (03-149.2, polymyxin-resistant, MIC 32 mg/L, carbapenem-resistant, ampicillin/sulbactam-resistant). Using the patient's unique pharmacokinetics, the patient's actual regimen received in the clinic was recreated in a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) to track the emergence of polymyxin resistance against 03-149.1. A subsequent HFIM challenged the pan-resistant 03-149.2 isolate against polymyxin B, meropenem and ampicillin/sulbactam alone and in two-drug and three-drug combinations. Results: Despite achieving colistin steady-state targets of an AUC 0-24 >60 mg·h/L and C avg of >2.5 mg/L, colistin population analysis profiles confirmed the clinical development of polymyxin resistance. During the simulation of the patient's colistin regimen in the HFIM, no killing was achieved in the HFIM and amplification of polymyxin resistance was observed by 96 h. Against the polymyxin-resistant isolate, the triple combination of polymyxin B, meropenem and ampicillin/sulbactam eradicated the A. baumannii by 96 h in the HFIM, whereas monotherapies and double combinations resulted in regrowth. Conclusions: To combat polymyxin-resistant A. baumannii , the triple combination of polymyxin B, meropenem and ampicillin/sulbactam holds great promise.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialAcinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsColistinDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymyxin BThienamycinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsColistinMeropenemPolymyxin BThienamycins

Identifiers

PMID28333347
PMCPMC5890697
OpenAlexW2591694049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.