Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333334›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2017

A mixed-method evaluation of peer-education workshops for school-aged children to teach about antibiotics, microbes and hygiene.

Vicki L Young, Amy Cole, Donna M Lecky, Dennis Fettis, Beth Pritchard, Neville Q Verlander, Charlotte V Eley, Cliodna A M McNulty

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vicki L YoungPublic Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.
Amy ColePublic Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.
Donna M LeckyPublic Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.
Dennis FettisEnvironmental Health Department, Forest of Dean District Council, Coleford GL16 8HG, UK.
Beth PritchardEnvironmental Health Department, Forest of Dean District Council, Coleford GL16 8HG, UK.
Neville Q VerlanderStatistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, Colindale, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Charlotte V EleyPublic Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.
Cliodna A M McNultyPublic Health England, Primary Care Unit, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital · GBPublic Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delivering health topics in schools through peer education is known to be beneficial for all students involved. In this study, we have evaluated a peer-education workshop that aims to educate primary and secondary school students on hygiene, the spread of infection and antibiotics. Methods: Four schools in south-west England, in a range of localities, took part in peer-education workshops, with students completing before, after and knowledge-retention questionnaires. Mixed-effect logistic regression and mixed-effect linear regression were used to analyse the data. Data were analysed by topic, region and peer/non-peer-educator status. Qualitative interviews and focus groups with students and educators were conducted to assess changes in participants' skills, confidence and behaviour. Results: Qualitative data indicated improvements in peer-educator skills and behaviour, including confidence, team-working and communication. There was a significant improvement in knowledge for all topics covered in the intervention, although this varied by region. In the antibiotics topic, peer-educators' knowledge increased in the retention questionnaire, whereas non-peer-educators' knowledge decreased. Knowledge declined in the retention questionnaires for the other topics, although this was mostly not significant. Conclusions: This study indicates that peer education is an effective way to educate young people on important topics around health and hygiene, and to concurrently improve communication skills. Its use should be encouraged across schools to help in the implementation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance that recommends children are taught in an age-appropriate manner about hygiene and antibiotics.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSchoolsAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildEnglandFemaleHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHygieneMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28333334
PMCPMC5890736
OpenAlexW2595484427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.