Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28333217›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2017

Recurrent Gene Duplication Leads to Diverse Repertoires of Centromeric Histones in Drosophila Species.

Lisa E Kursel, Harmit S Malik

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Retention of a singlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The dynamic centromere.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Centromeres drive and take a break.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa E KurselMolecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Harmit S MalikDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
Genetic Conflict Shapes Centromeres and HeterochromatinR01GM074108 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MALIK, HARMIT S. · 2005 to 2022
$6.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074108NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their essential role in the process of chromosome segregation in most eukaryotes, centromeric histones show remarkable evolutionary lability. Not only have they been lost in multiple insect lineages, but they have also undergone gene duplication in multiple plant lineages. Based on detailed study of a handful of model organisms including Drosophila melanogaster, centromeric histone duplication is considered to be rare in animals. Using a detailed phylogenomic study, we find that Cid, the centromeric histone gene, has undergone at least four independent gene duplications during Drosophila evolution. We find duplicate Cid genes in D. eugracilis (Cid2), in the montium species subgroup (Cid3, Cid4) and in the entire Drosophila subgenus (Cid5). We show that Cid3, Cid4, and Cid5 all localize to centromeres in their respective species. Some Cid duplicates are primarily expressed in the male germline. With rare exceptions, Cid duplicates have been strictly retained after birth, suggesting that they perform nonredundant centromeric functions, independent from the ancestral Cid. Indeed, each duplicate encodes a distinct N-terminal tail, which may provide the basis for distinct protein-protein interactions. Finally, we show some Cid duplicates evolve under positive selection whereas others do not. Taken together, our results support the hypothesis that Drosophila Cid duplicates have subfunctionalized. Thus, these gene duplications provide an unprecedented opportunity to dissect the multiple roles of centromeric histones.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCentromereCentromere Protein ADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGene ConversionGene DuplicationHistonesModels, GeneticPhylogenySelection, GeneticCentromere Protein ACid protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsHistonesgene conversionmolecular evolutionpositive selectionprotein motifs

Identifiers

PMID28333217
PMCPMC5435080
OpenAlexW2950289975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.