Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28332372›Full record

Trial reportYonsei medical journal2017

Efficacy and Safety of Different Aceclofenac Treatments for Chronic Lower Back Pain: Prospective, Randomized, Single Center, Open-Label Clinical Trials.

Jae Ho Yang, Kyung Soo Suk, Byung Ho Lee, Woo Chul Jung, Young Mi Kang, Ji Hye Kim, Hak Sun Kim, Hwan Mo Lee, Seong Hwan Moon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Yonsei medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05207605 (Effects of Rhythmic Stabilization and Mckenzie Techniques on Pain and Function in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05207605 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Rhythmic Stabilization and Mckenzie Techniques on Pain and Function in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled36ConditionsBack PainArmsRhythmic Stabilization (RS), McKenzie technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jae Ho YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Soo SukDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Ho LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Catholic-Kwandong University College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Woo Chul JungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Young Mi KangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Hye KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hak Sun KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hwan Mo LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Hwan MoonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. shmoon@yuhs.ac.
Yonsei University · KRCatholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are a mainstay for medical treatment of chronic lower back pain (CLBP). Increased dose intervals for medication have been associated with increased patient adherence to prescriptions. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of a once daily dose of aceclofenac controlled release (CR) and a twice daily dose of aceclofenac for CLBP management. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective, randomized, single center, open-label clinical trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac CR (200 mg once daily) to aceclofenac dose (100 mg twice daily). Fifty patients in each group were enrolled for the study. The primary end point was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) change at baseline to that at 2 weeks after medication and safety profiles. Also, change in quality of life measured by EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) functional score for the lumbar spine were also assessed.

resultsWithin groups at pre- and post-treatment, there were significant VAS reductions for aceclofenac CR and aceclofenac (p=0.028). EQ-5D increased significantly in both groups (p=0.037). ODI scores decreased significantly in both groups (p=0.012). However, there were no significant differences between aceclofenac CR and aceclofenac at pre- and post-treatment. Patients with aceclofenac CR showed significant increases in heartburn and indigestion and adverse gastrointestinal effects, compared to aceclofenac.

conclusionIn patients with CLBP, aceclofenac CR and aceclofenac demonstrated significant symptomatic pain relief, improvement in quality of life and functional scores. Aceclofenac CR slightly increased gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as heartburn and indigestion.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeaceclofenacAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacaceclofenacChronic lower back painNSAIDs

Identifiers

PMID28332372
PMCPMC5368152
OpenAlexW2599109470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.