ReviewJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017
Reducing radiation to patients and improving image quality in a real-world nuclear cardiology laboratory.
Review in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear Cardiology in Women and Underrepresented Minority Populations.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Deep learning, another important tool for improving acquisition efficiency in SPECT MPI Imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- The way to the heart is through the stomach; PPI's, aspirin, and gastric radiotracer activity.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Good drivers: Achieving dose reduction across a health care system through implementation of multiple radiation-sparing practices.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Review
- The Private Practice Corner: A new column in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In part because of aging equipment and reduced reimbursement for imaging services in the last several years, nuclear cardiologists who remain in private practice face challenges in maintaining high quality and in reducing radiation exposure to patients. We review patient-centered approaches and affordable software solutions employed in our practice combined with supine-prone myocardial perfusion imaging to achieve increased interpretive confidence with reduced radiation exposure to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28332179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.