Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28332010›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2017

An evidence-based walking program among older people with knee osteoarthritis: the PEP (participant exercise preference) pilot randomized controlled trial.

Laurianne Loew, Lucie Brosseau, Glen P Kenny, Natalie Durand-Bush, Stéphane Poitras, Gino De Angelis, George A Wells

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04106986 (The Effect Of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field And Progressive Resistance Exercise On Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04106986 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field And Progressive Resistance Exercise On Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJordan University of Science and TechnologyRan2019 to 2020Enrolled32ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsPulsed electromagnetic field and Progressives resistance exercise, PRE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurianne LoewSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. lloew079@uottawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7059-8859
Lucie BrosseauSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Glen P KennySchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Natalie Durand-BushSchool of Human Kinetics, Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stéphane PoitrasSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Gino De AngelisSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
George A WellsDepartment of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis is a common joint problem leading to an increase of pain and a loss of function in older individuals. The main objective of this study was to evaluate if a participant who was randomly assigned to his preferred group improved his adherence to an effective walking program compared to a participant who did not receive his preferred group. This was a 9-month pilot randomized clinical trial, based on a patient treatment preferences design. The 69 eligible participants had a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized to one of two groups: a supervised community-based or unsupervised walking program, based on the Ottawa Panel guidelines. At 6 months, participants who expressed a preference, either for the supervised or unsupervised program, and who were assigned to their preferred choice of program showed significantly higher adherence to walking sessions (supervised 60.7 ± 12.3%, P < 0.0001; unsupervised 43.1 ± 12.1%, P = 0.03), compared to the participants who did not obtain their preferred choice of program. After 9 months, significant improvements were shown according to the level of stiffness evaluated with the WOMAC (P = 0.01) and the functional status assessed with the Timed Up and GO Test (P = 0.04), among the adherent participants who obtained their preference, as compared to those who did not receive their preference. We show this approach promotes long-term adherence to a community-based walking program, while ensuring the maintenance of clinical benefits of walking, among older adults susceptible to avoid or not properly engage in physical activity.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeWalkingClinical trialsImplementationKneeOsteoarthritisPreferenceWalking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.