Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28331654›Full record

ArticleThe journal of breast health2014

Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response with Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Locally Advanced Invasive Breast Cancer.

Naciye Sinem Gezer, Özge Orbay, Pınar Balcı, Merih Guray Durak, Binnaz Demirkan, Serdar Saydam

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of breast health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naciye Sinem GezerDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
Özge OrbayDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
Pınar BalcıDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
Merih Guray DurakDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
Binnaz DemirkanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
Serdar SaydamDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
Dokuz Eylül University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe reliability of traditional methods such as physical examination, ultrasonography (US) and mammography is limited in determining the type of treatment response in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) application for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining popularity in the evaluation of NAC response. This study aimed to compare NAC response as determined by dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with LABC to histopathology that is the gold standard; and evaluate the compatibility of MRI, mammography and US with response types. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe US, mammography and MRI findings of 38 patients who received NAC with a diagnosis of locally advanced breast cancer and surgical treatment were retrospectively analyzed and compared to histopathology results. Type of response to treatment was determined according to the "Criteria in Solid Tumors Response Evolution 1.1" by mammography, US and MRI criteria. The relationship between response types as defined by all three imaging modalities and histopathology were evaluated, and the correlation of response type as detected by MRI and pathological response and histopathological type of breast cancer was further determined. For statistical analysis, the chi-square, paired t test, correlation and kappa tests were used.

resultsThere is a statistical moderate positive correlation between response type according to pathology and MRI (kappa: 0.63). There was a weak correlation between response type according to mammography or US and according to pathology (kappa: 0.2). When the distribution of treatment response by MRI is stratified according to histopathological types, partial response was higher in all histopathological types similar to the type of pathologic response. When compared with pathology MRI detected treatment response accurately in 84.2% of the patients.

conclusionDynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI appears to be a more effective method than mammography or US in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MRI evaluation of LABC is accepted as the appropriate radiological approach.

Indexed as

breastCancerchemotherapyMRIneoadjuvantresponse

Identifiers

PMID28331654
PMCPMC5351468
OpenAlexW2145875561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.