Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28331632›Full record

ArticleZoological letters2017

Group-housed females promote production of asexual ootheca in American cockroaches.

Ko Katoh, Masazumi Iwasaki, Shouhei Hosono, Atsushi Yoritsune, Masanori Ochiai, Makoto Mizunami, Hiroshi Nishino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ko Katoh *Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0810 Japan.
Masazumi Iwasaki *Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812 Japan.
Shouhei HosonoGraduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0810 Japan.
Atsushi YoritsuneResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812 Japan.
Masanori OchiaiThe Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0819 Japan.
Makoto MizunamiFaculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0810 Japan.
Hiroshi NishinoResearch Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812 Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPTamagawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFacultative parthenogenesis, seen in many animal phyla, is a reproductive strategy in which females are able to generate offspring when mating partners are unavailable. In some subsocial and eusocial insects, parthenogenesis is often more prevalent than sexual reproduction. However, little is known about how social cooperation is linked to the promotion of parthenogenesis. The domiciliary cockroach

resultsWe studied environmental factors that influence asexual production of ootheca using behavioral assays in

conclusionsGroup-housed females promote and stabilize asexual ootheca production compared to isolated females, and that this promotion is triggered by female-specific chemosensory signals (other than sex pheromone) primarily detected by antennae. Promotion of ootheca production between females is likely to be an early stage of social cooperation, reminiscent of the foundation and maintenance of a colony by female pairs in the eusocial termite

Indexed as

AntennaChemosensory signalCockroachesParthenogenesis, group effectPeriplanoneSex pheromoneSexual reproduction

Identifiers

PMID28331632
PMCPMC5348754
OpenAlexW2595428526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.