Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28331608›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2017

American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) joint consensus statement on measurement to maintain and improve quality of enhanced recovery pathways for elective colorectal surgery.

S Ramani Moonesinghe, Michael P W Grocott, Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, Roberto Bergamaschi, Vijaya Gottumukkala, Thomas J Hopkins, Stuart McCluskey, Tong J Gan, Michael Monty G Mythen, Andrew D Shaw and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S Ramani Moonesinghe *UCLH NIHR Surgical Outcomes Research Centre and NIAA Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
Michael P W Grocott *Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elliott Bennett-GuerreroDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Roberto BergamaschiDepartment of Surgery, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Vijaya GottumukkalaMD Anderson, Texas, USA.
Thomas J HopkinsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Stuart McCluskeyDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON USA.
Tong J GanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Michael Monty G MythenDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew D ShawDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee USA.
Timothy E MillerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina USA.
Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) I Workgroup

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article sets out a framework for measurement of quality of care relevant to enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) in elective colorectal surgery. The proposed framework is based on established measurement systems and/or theories, and provides an overview of the different approaches for improving clinical monitoring, and enhancing quality improvement or research in varied settings with different levels of available resources.

methodsUsing a structure-process-outcome framework, we make recommendations for three hierarchical tiers of data collection. DISCUSSION: Core, Quality Improvement, and Best Practice datasets are proposed. The suggested datasets incorporate patient data to describe case-mix, process measures to describe delivery of enhanced recovery and clinical outcomes. The fundamental importance of routine collection of data for the initiation, maintenance, and enhancement of enhanced recovery pathways is emphasized.

Indexed as

Colorectal surgeryEnhanced recoveryEnhanced recovery pathwayOutcomesQuality

Identifiers

PMID28331608
PMCPMC5356230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.