Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28331535›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2017

rosettR: protocol and software for seedling area and growth analysis.

Filipa Tomé, Karel Jansseune, Bernadette Saey, Jack Grundy, Korneel Vandenbroucke, Matthew A Hannah, Henning Redestig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Plant methods · 2019
    Article
  4. Crop Phenomics: Current Status and Perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Filipa ToméBayer CropScience NV, Technologiepark 38, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8559-5274
Karel JansseuneBayer CropScience NV, Technologiepark 38, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Bernadette SaeyBayer CropScience NV, Technologiepark 38, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Jack GrundyBayer CropScience NV, Technologiepark 38, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Korneel VandenbrouckeBayer CropScience NV, Technologiepark 38, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Matthew A HannahBayer CropScience NV, Technologiepark 38, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Henning RedestigBayer CropScience NV, Technologiepark 38, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowth is an important parameter to consider when studying the impact of treatments or mutations on plant physiology. Leaf area and growth rates can be estimated efficiently from images of plants, but the experiment setup, image analysis, and statistical evaluation can be laborious, often requiring substantial manual effort and programming skills.

resultsHere we present

conclusionsUsing rosettR it is straight-forward to perform accurate, reproducible measurements of rosette area and relative growth rate with high-throughput using inexpensive equipment. Suitable applications include screening mutant populations for growth phenotypes visible at early growth stages and profiling different genotypes in a wide variety of treatments.

Indexed as

GrowthImage analysisLeaf areaPhenotypingR

Identifiers

PMID28331535
PMCPMC5353781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.