Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28331295›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2017

Evaluating the patient experience after implantation of a 0.4 mg sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™): results of a qualitative survey.

Joseph P Gira, Reginald Sampson, Steven M Silverstein, Thomas R Walters, Jamie Lynne Metzinger, Jonathan H Talamo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04371445 (Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for Management of Post-operative Pain and Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Vitreoretinal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04371445 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Intracanalicular Dexamethasone Insert for Management of Post-operative Pain and Inflammation in Patients Undergoing Vitreoretinal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2020 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsVitreoretinal Surgery, Ocular Inflammation, Post-operative Pain, Post-Operative InflammationArmsDexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert, Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Drug Delivery Systems for Glaucoma: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Progress in Ocular Drug Delivery: Challenges and Constraints.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph P GiraOphthalmology Consultants, St Louis, MO.
Reginald SampsonMontebello Medical Center, Inc., Montebello, CA.
Steven M SilversteinSilverstein Eye Centers, Kansas City, MO.
Thomas R WaltersTexan Eye, Austin, TX.
Jamie Lynne MetzingerOcular Therapeutix, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA.
Jonathan H TalamoOcular Therapeutix, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA.
Ophthalmology Consultants · USStar Center · USTexan Eye · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient experience of sustained release dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (Dextenza™) following cataract surgery as part of a Phase III clinical trial program.

methodsThis cross-sectional, qualitative evaluation involved individual interviews lasting approximately 45 minutes. Patients from four US investigational study sites who had previously received an insert were enrolled. There were no predesignated end points; this was a qualitative survey seeking a deeper understanding of patient experience.

resultsTwenty-five patients were interviewed. Most patients (92%) reported the highest level of satisfaction grade with regard to overall product satisfaction. All patients described the insert as comfortable. Most patients (96%) described their overall experience with the insert as very convenient or extremely convenient. Twenty-two of 23 (96%) participants rated their experience with the insert as "very" or "extremely convenient", compared to previous topical therapy, and 88% of patients stated that if they were to undergo cataract surgery again, they would request the insert. When asked if they would recommend the insert to family members or friends, 92% stated they would. The survey found that 84% of participants would be willing to pay more for the insert than for eye drop therapy.

conclusionThe dexamethasone insert was found by patients to be highly favorable with regard to overall satisfaction, convenience, and comfort. The insert was well received and largely preferred over topical therapy alternatives following surgery. More extensive evaluation of the patient experience is warranted, and future studies should help inform design of the next generation of sustained release drug delivery systems.

Indexed as

cataractcorticosteroiddexamethasoneDextenzadrug deliverysustained release

Identifiers

PMID28331295
PMCPMC5352246
OpenAlexW2593206043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.