Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28331214›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2017

Antihypertensive medications and the risk of kidney stones in older adults: a retrospective cohort study.

R Todd Alexander, Eric McArthur, Racquel Jandoc, Blayne Welk, Jade S Hayward, Arsh K Jain, Branko Braam, Veit Flockerzi, Amit X Garg, Robert Ross Quinn

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antihypertensive medication and risk of kidney stones: a Canadian wake-up call.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

R Todd AlexanderDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Eric McArthurInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Racquel JandocInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Blayne WelkInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jade S HaywardInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arsh K JainInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Branko BraamDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Veit FlockerziDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Saarland University School of Medicine, Homburg, Germany.
Amit X GargInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert Ross QuinnDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Alberta · CASaarland University · DEUniversity of Calgary · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antihypertensives are widely prescribed and could influence kidney stone risk by altering urinary calcium excretion. However, the impact of different classes of antihypertensives on kidney stone risk is unknown. To assess this impact, we conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked health administrative databases. Individuals aged >65 years who initiated one of the four antihypertensive classes (that is, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers or thiazide diuretics) were included. The participants were followed for the occurrence of a kidney stone event while maintaining continuous usage on their drug class. The association between antihypertensive class and outcome was estimated by Cox regression. Of the 542 581 people included, we observed 4533 kidney stone events (0.83%) over a median follow-up of 368 days (365-729). Compared with beta-blockers, thiazides were associated with a lower risk of kidney stones (hazard ratio (HR) 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.84), ACEis/ARBs with a borderline decreased risk (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83-0.98) and calcium channel blockers with a comparable risk (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92-1.13). When the risk of requiring an intervention for a kidney stone was examined, the results were consistent with the primary analysis; however, the protective effect of ACEis/ARBs was eliminated (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.87-1.06). In conclusion, relative to beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics were associated with a decreased risk of kidney stone formation in adults aged >65 years, whereas ACEis/ARBs and calcium channel blockers had a comparable risk of presenting with a kidney stone.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleHumansKidney CalculiMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID28331214
OpenAlexW2597453494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.