Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28331007›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurophysiology2017

Advantages of comparative studies in songbirds to understand the neural basis of sensorimotor integration.

Karagh Murphy, Logan S James, Jon T Sakata, Jonathan F Prather

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neurophysiological coordination of duet singing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Neural Code of Motor Planning and Execution during Goal-Directed Movements in Crows.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karagh MurphyProgram in Neuroscience, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming; and.
Logan S JamesDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jon T SakataDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jonathan F PratherProgram in Neuroscience, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming; and Jonathan.Prather@uwyo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorimotor integration is the process through which the nervous system creates a link between motor commands and associated sensory feedback. This process allows for the acquisition and refinement of many behaviors, including learned communication behaviors such as speech and birdsong. Consequently, it is important to understand fundamental mechanisms of sensorimotor integration, and comparative analyses of this process can provide vital insight. Songbirds offer a powerful comparative model system to study how the nervous system links motor and sensory information for learning and control. This is because the acquisition, maintenance, and control of birdsong critically depend on sensory feedback. Furthermore, there is an incredible diversity of song organizations across songbird species, ranging from songs with simple, stereotyped sequences to songs with complex sequencing of vocal gestures, as well as a wide diversity of song repertoire sizes. Despite this diversity, the neural circuitry for song learning, control, and maintenance remains highly similar across species. Here, we highlight the utility of songbirds for the analysis of sensorimotor integration and the insights about mechanisms of sensorimotor integration gained by comparing different songbird species. Key conclusions from this comparative analysis are that variation in song sequence complexity seems to covary with the strength of feedback signals in sensorimotor circuits and that sensorimotor circuits contain distinct representations of elements in the vocal repertoire, possibly enabling evolutionary variation in repertoire sizes. We conclude our review by highlighting important areas of research that could benefit from increased comparative focus, with particular emphasis on the integration of new technologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PerceptionFeedback, SensoryHumansLearningMotor ActivitySongbirdsSpecies SpecificityVocalization, Animalcommunicationcorollary dischargelearningsensorimotorsongbird

Identifiers

PMID28331007
PMCPMC5539457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.