Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330989›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Form-function relationships in dragonfly mandibles under an evolutionary perspective.

Alexander Blanke, Helmut Schmitz, Alessandra Patera, Hugo Dutel, Michael J Fagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Three-dimensional kinematics of leaf-cutter ant mandibles: not all dicondylic joints are simple hinges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mandibular morphology, task specialization and bite mechanics inJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander BlankeMedical and Biological Engineering Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK a.blanke@hull.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-6039
Helmut SchmitzInstitute for Zoology, University of Bonn, Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Alessandra PateraSwiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen 5232, Switzerland.
Hugo DutelMedical and Biological Engineering Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
Michael J FaganMedical and Biological Engineering Research Group, School of Engineering, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M008525/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional requirements may constrain phenotypic diversification or foster it. For insect mouthparts, the quantification of the relationship between shape and function in an evolutionary framework remained largely unexplored. Here, the question of a functional influence on phenotypic diversification for dragonfly mandibles is assessed with a large-scale biomechanical analysis covering nearly all anisopteran families, using finite element analysis in combination with geometric morphometrics. A constraining effect of phylogeny could be found for shape, the mandibular mechanical advantage (MA), and certain mechanical joint parameters, while stresses and strains, the majority of joint parameters and size are influenced by shared ancestry. Furthermore, joint mechanics are correlated with neither strain nor mandibular MA and size effects have virtually play no role for shape or mechanical variation. The presence of mandibular strengthening ridges shows no phylogenetic signal except for one ridge peculiar to Libelluloidea, and ridge presence is also not correlated with each other. The results suggest that functional traits are more variable at this taxonomic level and that they are not influenced by shared ancestry. At the same time, the results contradict the widespread idea that mandibular morphology mainly reflects functional demands at least at this taxonomic level. The varying functional factors rather lead to the same mandibular performance as expressed by the MA, which suggests a many-to-one mapping of the investigated parameters onto the same narrow mandibular performance space.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMandibleModels, BiologicalOdonataAnimalsfinite element analysisfunctional morphologygeometric morphometricsinsectphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID28330989
PMCPMC5378138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.