Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330984›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Theoretically possible spatial accuracy of geomagnetic maps used by migrating animals.

Andrei V Komolkin, Pavel Kupriyanov, Andrei Chudin, Julia Bojarinova, Kirill Kavokin, Nikita Chernetsov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Magnetic maps in animal navigation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Review
  7. The discovery of the use of magnetic navigational information.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrei V KomolkinSaint Petersburg State University, 7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia a.komolkin@spbu.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-3577-1978
Pavel KupriyanovSaint Petersburg State University, 7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6610-2785
Andrei ChudinSaint Petersburg State University, 7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2325-1219
Julia BojarinovaSaint Petersburg State University, 7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1759-686X
Kirill KavokinSaint Petersburg State University, 7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0047-5706
Nikita ChernetsovSaint Petersburg State University, 7-9 Universitetskaya Emb., St Petersburg 199034, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-6829
St Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many migrating animals, belonging to different taxa, annually move across the globe and cover hundreds and thousands of kilometres. Many of them are able to show site fidelity, i.e. to return to relatively small migratory targets, from distant areas located beyond the possible range of direct sensory perception. One widely debated possibility of how they do it is the use of a magnetic map, based on the dependence of parameters of the geomagnetic field (total field intensity and inclination) on geographical coordinates. We analysed temporal fluctuations of the geomagnetic field intensity as recorded by three geomagnetic observatories located in Europe within the route of many avian migrants, to study the highest theoretically possible spatial resolution of the putative map. If migratory birds measure total field intensity perfectly and take the time of day into account, in northern Europe 81% of them may return to a strip of land of 43 km in width along one of coordinates, whereas in more southern areas such a strip may be narrower than 10 km. However, if measurements are performed with an error of 0.1%, the strip width is increased by approximately 40 km, so that in spring migrating birds are able to return to within 90 km of their intended goal. In this case, migrating birds would probably need another navigation system, e.g. an olfactory map, intermediate between the large-scale geomagnetic map and the local landscape cues, to locate their goal to within several kilometres.

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsModels, BiologicalAnimal MigrationAnimalsBirdsEuropeOrientationgeomagnetic fieldmigrationnavigationsite fidelity

Identifiers

PMID28330984
PMCPMC5378134
OpenAlexW2599373917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.