Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330914›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.

Mikael Puurtinen, Lutz Fromhage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex roles and the evolution of parental care specialization.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Not all sex ratios are equal: the Fisher condition, parental care and sexual selection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mikael PuurtinenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla, PO Box 35, 40014, Finland mikael.puurtinen@jyu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-2762
Lutz FromhageDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyvaskyla, PO Box 35, 40014, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-6673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the evolution of male and female mating strategies and mate choice for female fecundity and male fertilization ability in a system where both sexes can mate with multiple partners, and where there is variation in individual quality (i.e. in the availability of resources individuals can allocate to matings, mate choice and production of gametes). We find that when the cost of mating differs between sexes, the sex with higher cost of mating is reluctant to accept matings and is often also choosy, while the other sex accepts all matings. With equal mating costs, the evolution of mating strategies depends on the strength of female sperm limitation, so that when sperm limitation is strong, males are often reluctant and choosy, whereas females tend to accept available matings. Male reluctance evolves because a male's benefit per mating diminishes rapidly as he mates too often, hence losing out in the process of sperm competition as he spends much of his resources on mating costs rather than ejaculate production. When sperm limitation is weaker, females become more reluctant and males are more eager to mate. The model thus suggests that reversed sex roles are plausible outcomes of polyandry and limited sperm production. Implications for empirical studies of mate choice are discussed.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChoice BehaviorSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleModels, BiologicalReproductionSpermatozoamultiple matingpolyandrysex rolessexual selectionsperm competition

Identifiers

PMID28330914
PMCPMC5378073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.