Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330753›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2017

Rationale and study protocol for the Patient-Centered Outcome Aid (PCOA) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision tool for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients.

L Wenzel, D Mukamel, K Osann, L Havrilesky, L Sparks, J Lipscomb, A A Wright, J Walker, R Alvarez, L Van Le and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis: One Decade Later.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

L WenzelUniversity of California, Irvine, United States. Electronic address: lwenzel@uci.edu.
D MukamelUniversity of California, Irvine, United States.
K OsannUniversity of California, Irvine, United States.
L HavrileskyDuke University, United States.
L SparksChapman University, United States.
J LipscombEmory University, United States.
A A WrightDana Farber Cancer Institute, United States.
J WalkerUniversity of Oklahoma, United States.
R AlvarezVanderbilt University, United States.
L Van LeUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States.
K RobisonBrown University, United States.
R BristowUniversity of California, Irvine, United States.
R MorganCity of Hope, United States.
B J RimelCedars Sinai, United States.
H LaddUniversity of California, Irvine, United States.
S HsiehUniversity of California, Irvine, United States.
A WahiUniversity of California, Irvine, United States.
D CohnOhio State University, United States.

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Christine Hui · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPatient PreferenceAgedDrug Administration RoutesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMental HealthMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID28330753
PMCPMC6198815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.