ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2017
Antibiotic resistance and biofilm production among the strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal.
Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global prevalence of macrolide-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance Profile, and Multidrug Resistance of Methicillin-ResistantHealth science reports · 2026Article
- Aminoglycoside Resistance Among Clinical Bacterial Isolates in Sétif, Algeria: Epidemiology, Multidrug Resistance, and Virulence Features.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus Aureus isolated from clinical specimens at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized referral hospital northwest Ethiopia; a retrospective study.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: a genetic and physiological perspective.Gut pathogens · 2025Review
- Unveiling Hidden Threats: Bacterial Contamination of Frequently Touched Objects and the Biofilm Property ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025Article
- Antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm forming ability ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Recent development and fighting strategies for lincosamide antibiotic resistance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Review
- Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern among Clinically IsolatedJournal of pathogens · 2024Article
- Differences in Biofilm Formation by Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-SusceptibleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm Formation ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and multidrug resistance of methicillin-resistantBMJ open · 2023Observational
- Short Peripheral Venous Catheters Contamination and the Dangers of Bloodstream Infection in Portugal: An Analytic Study.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- In Vitro Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities ofActa medica Philippina · 2023Article
- Methicillin-Resistant and Biofilm-ProducingThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2023Article
- Phenotypic detection of methicillin resistance, biofilm production, and inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Kathmandu, Nepal.Tropical medicine and health · 2022Article
- High level of persister frequency in clinical staphylococcal isolates.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- Biofilm-Associated Multi-Drug Resistance in Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Review
- Biofilm Formation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing drug resistance along with inducible clindamycin resistance, methicillin resistance and biofilm production among the strains of Staphylococcus aureus are present as the serious problems to the successful treatment of the infections caused by S. aureus. So, the main objectives of this study were to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns along with the rates of inducible clindamycin resistance, methicillin resistance and biofilm production among the strains of S. aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples.
methodsA total of 830 non-repeated pus/wound swab samples were processed using standard microbiological techniques. The colonies grown were identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram's stain and biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique. Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance was performed by D test, while detection of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was performed by determination of minimum inhibitory concentration of oxacillin by agar dilution method. Similarly, detection of biofilm formation was performed by microtiter plate method. Strains showing resistance to three or more than three different classes of antibiotics were considered multidrug resistant.
resultsTotal 76 samples showed the growth of S. aureus, among which 36 (47.4%) contained MRSA and 17 (22.4%) samples were found to have S. aureus showing inducible clindamycin resistance. Among the S. aureus isolated from outpatients, 41.9% were MRSA. Highest rates of susceptibility of S. aureus were seen toward linezolid (100%) and vancomycin (100%). Similarly, S. aureus isolated from 35 (46.1%) samples were found to be biofilm producers. Higher rate of inducible clindamycin resistance was seen among MRSA in comparison to methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Similarly, higher rates of multidrug resistance and methicillin resistance were found among biofilm producing strains in comparison to biofilm non producing strains.
conclusionsThe rate of isolation of MRSA from community acquired infections was found to be high in Nepal. Increased rate of inducible clindamycin resistance as compared to previous studies in Nepal was noted. So for the proper management of the infections caused by S. aureus, D test for the detection of inducible clindamycin resistance should be included in the routine laboratory diagnosis. Further, detection of biofilm production should also be included in the routine tests. Linezolid and vancomycin can be used for the preliminary treatment of the serious infections caused by S. aureus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.