Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330484›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2017

Antibiotic resistance and biofilm production among the strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal.

Ankit Belbase, Narayan Dutt Pant, Krishus Nepal, Bibhusan Neupane, Rikesh Baidhya, Reena Baidya, Binod Lekhak

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global prevalence of macrolide-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Unveiling Hidden Threats: Bacterial Contamination of Frequently Touched Objects and the Biofilm Property ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
  7. Antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm forming ability ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Pathogens and global health · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm Formation ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methicillin-Resistant and Biofilm-ProducingThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Biofilm Formation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ankit BelbaseDepartment of Microbiology, GoldenGate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Narayan Dutt PantDepartment of Microbiology, Grande International Hospital, Dhapasi, Kathmandu, Nepal. ndpant1987@gmail.com.
Krishus NepalDepartment of Microbiology, GoldenGate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bibhusan NeupaneDepartment of Microbiology, GoldenGate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rikesh BaidhyaDepartment of Microbiology, GoldenGate International College, Battisputali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Reena BaidyaDepartment of Pathology, B&B Hospital, Gwarko, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Binod LekhakCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal.
Baidya and Banskota Hospital · NPGrande International Hospital · NPTribhuvan University · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing drug resistance along with inducible clindamycin resistance, methicillin resistance and biofilm production among the strains of Staphylococcus aureus are present as the serious problems to the successful treatment of the infections caused by S. aureus. So, the main objectives of this study were to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns along with the rates of inducible clindamycin resistance, methicillin resistance and biofilm production among the strains of S. aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples.

methodsA total of 830 non-repeated pus/wound swab samples were processed using standard microbiological techniques. The colonies grown were identified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram's stain and biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique. Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance was performed by D test, while detection of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was performed by determination of minimum inhibitory concentration of oxacillin by agar dilution method. Similarly, detection of biofilm formation was performed by microtiter plate method. Strains showing resistance to three or more than three different classes of antibiotics were considered multidrug resistant.

resultsTotal 76 samples showed the growth of S. aureus, among which 36 (47.4%) contained MRSA and 17 (22.4%) samples were found to have S. aureus showing inducible clindamycin resistance. Among the S. aureus isolated from outpatients, 41.9% were MRSA. Highest rates of susceptibility of S. aureus were seen toward linezolid (100%) and vancomycin (100%). Similarly, S. aureus isolated from 35 (46.1%) samples were found to be biofilm producers. Higher rate of inducible clindamycin resistance was seen among MRSA in comparison to methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Similarly, higher rates of multidrug resistance and methicillin resistance were found among biofilm producing strains in comparison to biofilm non producing strains.

conclusionsThe rate of isolation of MRSA from community acquired infections was found to be high in Nepal. Increased rate of inducible clindamycin resistance as compared to previous studies in Nepal was noted. So for the proper management of the infections caused by S. aureus, D test for the detection of inducible clindamycin resistance should be included in the routine laboratory diagnosis. Further, detection of biofilm production should also be included in the routine tests. Linezolid and vancomycin can be used for the preliminary treatment of the serious infections caused by S. aureus.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialBacteriological TechniquesBiofilmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNepalStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSuppurationTertiary Care CentersWound InfectionBiofilmInducible clindamycin resistanceLinezolidMRSAS. aureusVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID28330484
PMCPMC5363015
OpenAlexW2600395641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.