Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330483›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2017

Predictors of hospital and one-year mortality in intensive care patients with refractory status epilepticus: a population-based study.

Anne-Mari Kantanen, Reetta Kälviäinen, Ilkka Parviainen, Marika Ala-Peijari, Tom Bäcklund, Juha Koskenkari, Ruut Laitio, Matti Reinikainen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Management of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Updates in Refractory Status Epilepticus.Critical care research and practice · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne-Mari KantanenEpilepsy Center, Neurocenter, Department of Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. anne-mari.kantanen@kuh.fi.
Reetta KälviäinenEpilepsy Center, Neurocenter, Department of Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Box 100, Kuopio, 70029, KYS, Finland.
Ilkka ParviainenDepartment of Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Marika Ala-PeijariDivision of Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tom BäcklundDepartments of Internal Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Juha KoskenkariDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Ruut LaitioDivision of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Matti ReinikainenDepartment of Intensive Care, North Karelia Central Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim was to determine predictors of hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with intensive care unit (ICU)-treated refractory status epilepticus (RSE) in a population-based study.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of the Finnish Intensive Care Consortium (FICC) database of adult patients (16 years of age or older) with ICU-treated RSE in Finland during a 3-year period (2010-2012). The database consists of admissions to all 20 Finnish hospitals treating RSE in the ICU. All five university hospitals and 11 out of 15 central hospitals participated in the present study. The total adult referral population in the study hospitals was 3.92 million, representing 91% of the adult population of Finland. Patients whose condition had a post-anoxic aetiological basis were excluded.

resultsWe identified 395 patients with ICU-treated RSE, corresponding to an annual incidence of 3.4/100,000 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.04-3.71). Hospital mortality was 7.4% (95% CI 0-16.9%), and 1-year mortality was 25.4% (95% CI 21.2-29.8%). Mortality at hospital discharge was associated with severity of organ dysfunction. Mortality at 1 year was associated with older age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.033, 95% CI 1.104-1.051, p = 0.001), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (aOR 1.156, CI 1.051-1.271, p = 0.003), super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) (aOR 2.215, 95% CI 1.20-3.84, p = 0.010) and dependence in activities of daily living (ADL) (aOR 2.553, 95% CI 1.537-4.243, p < 0.0001).

conclusionsDespite low hospital mortality, 25% of ICU-treated RSE patients die within a year. Super-refractoriness, dependence in ADL functions, severity of organ dysfunction at ICU admission and older age predict long-term mortality.

trial registrationRetrospective registry study; no interventions on human participants.

Indexed as

MortalityTime FactorsAdultAgedChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansIncidenceIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresRegistriesICU treatmentIncidenceMortalityOutcomeRefractory status epilepticusStatus epilepticusSuper-refractory status epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID28330483
PMCPMC5363025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.