Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330372›Full record

ReviewHuman gene therapy methods2017

CAR T-Cell Therapy: Progress and Prospects.

Olivia Wilkins, Allison M Keeler, Terence R Flotte

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human gene therapy methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Palliative Care in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2023
    Article
  7. The potential of plant extracts in cell therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Barriers to seeking psychosocial support among adult patients with hematologic neoplasms: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Evolving AAV-delivered therapeutics towards ultimate cures.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  13. CD4Cellular immunology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Improving Immunotherapy Through Glycodesign.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia Wilkins1 Department of Biology, Wheaton College , Norton, Massachusetts.
Allison M Keeler1 Department of Biology, Wheaton College , Norton, Massachusetts.
Terence R Flotte2 Department of Pediatrics and Horae Gene Therapy Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester, Massachusetts.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USWheaton College - Massachusetts · US

Funding

Viral Vector CoreP01HL131471 · NHLBI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FLOTTE, TERENCE R. · 2016 to 2020
$11.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL131471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lentivirus-mediated transduction of autologous T cells with a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) to confer a desired epitope specificity as a targeted immunotherapy for cancer has been among the first human gene therapy techniques to demonstrate widespread therapeutic efficacy. Other approaches to using gene therapy to enhance antitumor immunity have been less specific and less effective. These have included amplification, marking, and cytokine transduction of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, recombinant virus-based expression of tumor antigens as a tumor vaccine, and transduction of antigen-presenting cells with tumor antigens. Unlike any of those methods, the engineering of CAR T cells combine specific monoclonal antibody gene sequences to confer epitope specificity and other T-cell receptor and activation domains to create a self-contained single vector approach to produce a very specific antitumor response, as is seen with CD19-directed CAR T cells used to treat CD19-expressing B-cell malignancies. Recent success with these therapies is the culmination of a long step-wise iterative process of improvement in the design of CAR vectors. This review aims to summarize this long series of advances in the development of effective CAR vector since their initial development in the 1990s, and to describe emerging approaches to design that promise to enhance and widen the human gene therapy relevance of CAR T-cell therapy in the future.

Indexed as

Cytotoxicity, ImmunologicImmunotherapyAntigens, CD19Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansLentivirusLymphocyte ActivationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesAntigens, CD19CD19 molecule, humanReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellcancer immuno therapyCAR T-cellgene therapyimmunologylentivirus

Identifiers

PMID28330372
PMCPMC5429042
OpenAlexW2605697862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.