Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28330117›Full record

Review3 Biotech2016

Microbial pectinases: an ecofriendly tool of nature for industries.

G Garg, A Singh, A Kaur, R Singh, J Kaur, R Mahajan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
41.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of Celeriac Pulp Maceration byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. A Novel Endo-Polygalacturonase fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G GargDepartment of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markendeshwar University, Mullana, Ambala, India.
A SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India.
A KaurDepartment of Biotechnology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India.
R SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
J KaurDepartment of Biotechnology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
R MahajanDepartment of Biotechnology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India. ritupanipat@rediffmail.com.
Kurukshetra University · INPanjab University · INMaharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pectinases are the growing enzymes of biotechnological sector, showing gradual increase in their market. They hold a leading position among the commercially produced industrial enzymes. These enzymes are ecofriendly tool of nature that are being used extensively in various industries like wine industry; food industry; paper industry for bleaching of pulp and waste paper recycling; in the processing of fruit-vegetables, tea-coffee, animal feed; extraction of vegetable oil and scouring of plant fibres. Moreover, enzymatic catalysis is preferred over other chemical methods, since it is more specific, less aggressive and saves energy. This is the review which covers the information available on the applicability potential of this group of enzymes in various sectors.

Indexed as

BiobleachingBioscouringClarificationDegummingRecycling

Identifiers

PMID28330117
PMCPMC4746199
OpenAlexW2255192123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.