ArticleWorld journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery2017
Current Practices in the Timing of Stage 2 Palliation.
Article in World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMortality through single-ventricle palliation remains high and the effect of the timing of stage 2 palliation (S2P) is not well understood. We investigated current practice patterns in the timing of S2P across two professional societies and compared them to actual practice patterns from two databases of patients who underwent S2P.
methodsA ten-question survey was distributed to the members of the Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society (CHSS) and the European Congenital Heart Surgeons' Association (ECHSA). Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Surgeon-reported preferences were compared to clinical data from the CHSS Critical Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction (LVOTO) Registry and the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction (SVR) database.
resultsOverall, 38% (88 of 232) of surgeons from 74 institutions responded, of which 70% (62 of 88) were CHSS members and 30% (26 of 88) were ECHSA members. Surgeons reported performing S2P at a median of five months after stage 1 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.5-6), with no difference between CHSS and ECHSA surgeons. Surgeons reported performing nonelective S2P at a median of 4.5 months after stage 1 (IQR: 3.5-5.5), again with no difference by society. No difference existed between the surgeon-reported preferences and patient data in the Critical LVOTO and SVR databases for the timing of elective (5 vs 5.1 vs 5.3 months, P = .19) or nonelective S2P (4.5 vs 4.6 vs 4.2 months, P = .06).
conclusionThere was a remarkable lack of variation in surgeon preferences regarding the timing of S2P. This may represent a natural standardization of practice across congenital heart surgery, which is notable, given the current lack of guidelines regarding the timing of S2P.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.