ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2017
Custodiol versus cold Calafiore for elective cardiac arrest in isolated aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched analysis of 7263 patients.
Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardioplegia Strategies in Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- A nation-wide survey of myocardial protection in cardiovascular surgery.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Blood cardioplegia or custodiol for myocardial protection during valvular or aortic surgery: a propensity score adjusted comparison.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- The immunobiology and clinical use of genetically engineered porcine hearts for cardiac xenotransplantation.Nature cardiovascular research · 2022Article
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cardiac Surgery.Anesthesiology clinics · 2019Review
- Cardioplegia and myocardial protection: time for a reassessment?Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Cold crystalloid versus warm blood cardioplegia in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Different strategies of myocardial protection: the age of perfectionism.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
- Comparison of the different cardioplegic strategies in cardiac valves surgery: who wins the "arm-wrestling"?Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was designed to assess the impact of crystalloid cardioplegia (CCP) and blood cardioplegia (BCP) on short- and long-term outcome after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR).
methodsA total of 7263 patients undergoing AVR at our institution between November 1994 and June 2015 were identified. CCP (Custodiol ® ) was used in 83% ( n = 5998) and intermittent cold BCP in 1007 patients (14%). For 4790 patients, propensity scores were calculated from baseline data, risk factors, comorbidities and characteristics of the disease, resulting in 825 pairs. The primary outcome was operative mortality (OM).
resultsThere was no significant difference in OM between CCP and BCP cohorts [33 of 825 (4.0%) vs 35 of 825 (4.2%), P = 0.90]. The incidence of postoperative complications was comparable between both groups. Long-term survival was also not different between CCP and BCP (log-rank test: P = 0.9). Multiple Cox regression analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly affected by renal function ( P < 0.001), logistic EuroSCORE ( P < 0.001), male sex ( P = 0.005) and diabetes ( P = 0.037). Patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% showed improved survival when receiving BCP intraoperatively [odds ratio: 2.28 (1.12-4.63); P = 0.03].
conclusionsCCP and BCP provide equivalent outcome after isolated AVR. However, BCP seems to be beneficial for patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.