Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28329281›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Echinocandins Compared to Fluconazole for Candidemia of a Urinary Tract Source: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Guillermo Cuervo, Carolina Garcia-Vidal, Mireia Puig-Asensio, Antonio Vena, Yolanda Meije, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Eva González-Barberá, María José Blanco-Vidal, Adriana Manzur, Celia Cardozo and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frequency and Clinical Features ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Antifungal Resistance in Clinical Isolates ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Top-ten papers in fungal infection (2015-2017).Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillermo CuervoDepartment of Infectious Diseases.
Carolina Garcia-VidalDepartment of Infectious Diseases.
Mireia Puig-AsensioDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Antonio VenaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Yolanda MeijeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital de Barcelona.
Mario Fernández-RuizDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre", Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Eva González-BarberáDepartment of Microbiology Hospital Universitari I Politecnic "La Fe,"Valencia, and.
María José Blanco-VidalDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "Cruces,"Bilbao, Spain; and.
Adriana ManzurDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital "Dr Guillermo Rawson,"San Juan, Argentina.
Celia CardozoDepartment of Infectious Diseases.
Carlota GudiolDepartment of Infectious Diseases.
José Miguel MontejoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "Cruces,"Bilbao, Spain; and.
Javier PemánDepartment of Microbiology Hospital Universitari I Politecnic "La Fe,"Valencia, and.
Josefina AyatsDepartment of Infectious Diseases.
Jose María AguadoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre", Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Patricia MuñozDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Francesc MarcoDepartment of Infectious Diseases.
Benito AlmiranteDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Jordi CarratalàDepartment of Infectious Diseases.
for Grupo de Estudio de Micología Médica (GEMICOMED), Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC); and Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa (REIPI)
Hospital de Cruces · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESOffice of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether echinocandins could be used to treat candidemia of a urinary tract source (CUTS) is unknown. We aimed to provide current epidemiological information of CUTS and to compare echinocandin to fluconazole treatment on CUTS outcomes.

methodsA multicenter study of adult patients with candidemia was conducted in 9 hospitals. CUTS was defined as a candidemia with concomitant candiduria by the same organism associated with significant urological comorbidity. The primary outcome assessed was clinical failure (defined by 7-day mortality or persistent candidemia) in patients treated with either an echinocandin or fluconazole. A propensity score was calculated and then entered into a regression model.

resultsOf 2176 episodes of candidemia, 128 were CUTS (5.88%). Most CUTS cases were caused by Candida albicans (52.7%), followed by Candida glabrata (25.6%) and Candida tropicalis (16.3%). Clinical failure occurred in 7 patients (20%) treated with an echinocandin and in 15 (17.1%) treated with fluconazole (P = .730). Acute renal failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-8.91; P = .047) was the only independent factor associated with clinical failure, whereas early urinary tract drainage procedures (surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic) were identified as protective (AOR, 0.08; 95% CI, .02-.31; P < .001). Neither univariate nor multivariate analysis showed that echinocandin therapy altered the risk of clinical failure.

conclusionsInitial echinocandin therapy was not associated with clinical failure in patients with CUTS. Notably, acute renal failure predicted worse outcomes and performing an early urologic procedure was a protective measure.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsCandida albicansCandida glabrataCandidemiaCohort StudiesComorbidityEchinocandinsFemaleFluconazoleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFluconazolecandidemiaechinocandin therapypropensity score.urinary source

Identifiers

PMID28329281
OpenAlexW2592461310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.