Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28329223›Full record

Trial reportJAMA surgery2017

Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kathleen A Armstrong, Peter C Coyte, Mitchell Brown, Brett Beber, John L Semple

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02318953 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Mobile App Home Monitoring on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen's College HospitalRan2015 to 2015Enrolled70ConditionsUse of Mobile App Home Monitoring After Ambulatory SurgeryArmsMobile app follow-up care, Conventional, in-person follow-up care
NCT03456167 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Mobile App Postoperative Home Monitoring After Enhanced Recovery Oncologic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlberta Health Services, CalgaryRan2019 to 2021Enrolled72ConditionsBreast Cancer, Gynecologic CancerArmsRecoverWell mobile app for follow-up care
NCT04359160 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Follow-up by Mobile Application or Paper Questionnaire of Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Surgery: Monocentric, Prospective, Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorL'Institut de Recherche en Chirurgie Orthopédique et SportiveRan2020 to 2020Enrolled59ConditionsRotator Cuff InjuriesArmsOrthense, Orthense, Digikare Inc. Blagnac, France, Questionnaire
NCT04968145 nacompletednot on this map

Home To Stay: a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of a Post-discharge Mobile App on 30-day Re-admission Following Elective Colorectal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorDivision of General Surgery , Mt. Sinai HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled282ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Utilization, Health Care, SurgeryArmsHome To Stay Mobile Health Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Patients' expectations and barriers towards postoperative telehealth follow-up after oncologic breast surgery in France.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathleen A ArmstrongDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter C CoyteInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mitchell BrownDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brett BeberDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John L SempleDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada3Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In the age of information and patient-centered care, new methods of delivering postoperative care must be developed and evaluated. Objective: To determine whether follow-up care delivered via a mobile app can be used to avert in-person follow-up care visits compared with conventional, in-person follow-up care in the first 30 days following ambulatory surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 1 to August 31, 2015, among ambulatory patients undergoing breast reconstruction at an academic ambulatory care hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to receive follow-up care via a mobile app or at an in-person visit during the first 30 days after the operation. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the number of in-person follow-up visits during the first 30 days after the operation. Secondary end points were the number of telephone calls and emails to health care professionals, patient-reported convenience and satisfaction scores, and rates of complications. Results: Of the 65 women in the study (mean [SD] age, 47.7 [13.4] years), 32 (49%) were in the mobile app group, and 33 (51%) were in the in-person follow-up care group. Those in the mobile app group attended a mean of 0.66 in-person visits, vs 1.64 in-person visits in the in-person follow-up care group, for a difference of 0.40 times fewer in-person visits (95% CI, 0.24-0.66; P < .001) and sent more emails to their health care professionals during the first 30 days after the operation (mean, 0.65 vs 0.15; incidence rate ratio, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.55-10.99; P = .005) than did patients in the in-person follow-up care group. This statistically significant difference was maintained at 3 months postoperatively. The mobile app group reported higher convenience scores than the in-person follow-up care group (incidence rate ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.77; P = .008). There was no difference between groups in the number of telephone communications, satisfaction scores, or complication rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients undergoing ambulatory breast reconstruction can use follow-up care via a mobile app to avert in-person follow-up visits during the first 30 days after the operation. Mobile app follow-up care affects neither complication rates nor patient-reported satisfaction scores, but it improves patient-reported convenience scores. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02318953.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresMobile ApplicationsAdultAftercareElective Surgical ProceduresElectronic MailFemaleHumansMammaplastyMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPatient SatisfactionTelephone

Identifiers

PMID28329223
PMCPMC5547920
OpenAlexW2598817971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.