Trial reportJAMA surgery2017
Effect of Home Monitoring via Mobile App on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Mobile App Home Monitoring on the Number of In-Person Visits Following Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial
Mobile App Postoperative Home Monitoring After Enhanced Recovery Oncologic Surgery
Comparison of Follow-up by Mobile Application or Paper Questionnaire of Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Surgery: Monocentric, Prospective, Randomized Study
Home To Stay: a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of a Post-discharge Mobile App on 30-day Re-admission Following Elective Colorectal Surgery
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.
- Readiness for implementation of novel digital health interventions for postoperative monitoring: a systematic review and clinical innovation network analysis.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of impact of person-centred interventions for serious physical illness in terms of outcomes and costs.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Do postoperative telemedicine interventions with a communication feature reduce emergency department visits and readmissions?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Engaging Patients in Co-Design of Mobile Health Tools for Surgical Site Infection Surveillance: Implications for Research and Implementation.Surgical infections · 2019Pooled it
- Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Mobilizing Breast Cancer Prevention Research Through Smartphone Apps: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in public health · 2019Pooled it
- Medico-Economic Evaluation of a Telehealth Platform for Elective Outpatient Surgeries: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Review
- Patients' expectations and barriers towards postoperative telehealth follow-up after oncologic breast surgery in France.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Use of Smartphone Activity Data to Monitor and Identify Trends in Recovery After Breast Reduction Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Beyond the operating room: Holistic support for frail surgical patients.Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2026Article
- Digital Health Literacy and Tool Adoption in Postoperative Care in a Safety-Net Hospital Population: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Linking Patient-Reported and Clinician-Assessed Wound Status via Chatbot-Based Digital Surveillance for Wound Infection: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Improving the Patient Experience in Breast Reconstruction: ERAS and Beyond.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Development and Implementation of a Personal Virtual Assistant for Patient Engagement and Communication in Postsurgical Cancer Care: Feasibility Cohort Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Following Up Patients With Chronic Pain Using a Mobile App With a Support Center: Unicenter Prospective Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Article
- Platform-Based Patient-Clinician Digital Health Interventions for Care Transitions: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Enhancing Surgical Wound Monitoring: A Paired Cohort Study Evaluating a New AI-Based Application for Automatic Detection of Potential Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Patient experiences with a smartphone application dedicated to postoperative recovery after elective arthroplasty.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In the age of information and patient-centered care, new methods of delivering postoperative care must be developed and evaluated. Objective: To determine whether follow-up care delivered via a mobile app can be used to avert in-person follow-up care visits compared with conventional, in-person follow-up care in the first 30 days following ambulatory surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 1 to August 31, 2015, among ambulatory patients undergoing breast reconstruction at an academic ambulatory care hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to receive follow-up care via a mobile app or at an in-person visit during the first 30 days after the operation. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the number of in-person follow-up visits during the first 30 days after the operation. Secondary end points were the number of telephone calls and emails to health care professionals, patient-reported convenience and satisfaction scores, and rates of complications. Results: Of the 65 women in the study (mean [SD] age, 47.7 [13.4] years), 32 (49%) were in the mobile app group, and 33 (51%) were in the in-person follow-up care group. Those in the mobile app group attended a mean of 0.66 in-person visits, vs 1.64 in-person visits in the in-person follow-up care group, for a difference of 0.40 times fewer in-person visits (95% CI, 0.24-0.66; P < .001) and sent more emails to their health care professionals during the first 30 days after the operation (mean, 0.65 vs 0.15; incidence rate ratio, 4.13; 95% CI, 1.55-10.99; P = .005) than did patients in the in-person follow-up care group. This statistically significant difference was maintained at 3 months postoperatively. The mobile app group reported higher convenience scores than the in-person follow-up care group (incidence rate ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.77; P = .008). There was no difference between groups in the number of telephone communications, satisfaction scores, or complication rates. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients undergoing ambulatory breast reconstruction can use follow-up care via a mobile app to avert in-person follow-up visits during the first 30 days after the operation. Mobile app follow-up care affects neither complication rates nor patient-reported satisfaction scores, but it improves patient-reported convenience scores. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02318953.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.