ArticlePloS one2017
Influence of intraocular lens subsurface nanoglistenings on functional visual acuity.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual function in eyes with diffractive extended depth-of-focus and monofocal intraocular lenses: 2-year comparison.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Effect of Photochromic Contact Lens Wear on Indoor Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Article
- Functional visual acuity after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using an echelett optics.BMC ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Intraocular Scattering, Blinking Rate, and Tear Film Osmolarity After Exposure to Environmental Stress.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Quantitative evaluation of microvacuole formation in five intraocular lens models made of different hydrophobic materials.PloS one · 2021Article
- Influence of implantations of extended depth-of-focus on standard automated perimetry.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A narrative review of intraocular lens opacifications: update 2020.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Experimental and analytical quantification of light scattering from vacuoles in intraocular lenses.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2020Article
- The assessment of the impact of glistening on visual performance in relation to tear film quality.PloS one · 2020Observational
- Quantitative Multiparameter Evaluation of Vacuoles in Intraocular Lenses Employing a High-Magnification Digital Microscopy Method.Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
- Correction: Influence of intraocular lens subsurface nanoglistenings on functional visual acuity.PloS oneArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the influence of intraocular lens subsurface nanoglistenings (SSNGs) on functional visual acuity (FVA), thirty-nine eyes of 29 patients were examined in this study. The SSNG group comprised 19 eyes of 14 patients (75.7± 5.4 years, mean ± standard deviation), and the control group comprised 20 eyes of 15 patients (73.6 ± 6.5 years). The SSNGs were diagnosed on the basis of the typical whitish IOL appearance upon slit-lamp examination and results of densitometry regarding surface light scattering using Scheimpflug images. The FVA measurement system (AS-28; Kowa, Aichi, Japan) was used to examine changes in continuous visual acuity (VA) over time, and visual function parameters such as FVA, visual maintenance ratio (VMR), maximum VA, minimum VA, standard deviation of VA, and number of blinks were assessed. The results were compared between the SSNG and control groups, and correlations of FVA parameters with the intensity of surface light scattering, time after surgery, and age were also evaluated. There were significant differences in VMR (P = 0.035) and standard deviation of VAs (P = 0.031) between the two groups, although no significant differences were found in baseline VA, FVA, maximum VA, minimum VA, and number of blinks. None of the FVA parameters showed any significant correlations with the intensity of surface light scattering, time after surgery, or age. There is a possibility that VA is unstable during a continuous gazing task in patients with SSNGs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.