Observational studyMedicine2017
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma for various resection extent.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic analysis of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort studies.BMC cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of short- and long-term outcomes after pure laparoscopic versus open liver surgery in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Laparoscopic hepatectomy for elderly patients: Major findings based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Postoperative changes in body composition after laparoscopic and open resection of colorectal liver metastases: data from the randomized OSLO-COMET trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Current difficulty scoring systems may underestimate the technical complexity of segment 6 laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- From difficulty score to clinical outcome: Evaluating IWATE-criteria correlation with postoperative complications and revision surgery in anatomical liver resection.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2026Article
- A Decade of Experience Between Open and Minimally Invasive Hepatectomies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Pedunculated Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: When in Doubt, Should We Cut It Out?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with less significant muscle loss than the conventional open approach.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Four-year experience with more than 1000 cases of total laparoscopic liver resection in a single center.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in older patients: a propensity score matching analysis.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Perioperative steroid administration reduces overall complications in patients undergoing liver resection: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multicentric propensity score‑based analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic Liver Resection Should Be a Standard Procedure for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Low or Intermediate Difficulty.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic angiomyolipoma with preoperative diagnosis of other malignancy: a report of 2 cases.Surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic versus open major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case-matched analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2021Article
- Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is superior to hepatic resection in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the number of laparoscopic liver resections (LRRs) has increased, studies of surgical outcomes in comparison with the conventional open approach are limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the surgical outcomes (safety and efficacy) of LLR versus open liver resection (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).We collected data on all patients who received liver resection for HCC between April 2015 and September 2016 in our institution, and retrospectively investigated the demographic and perioperative data, and also surgical outcomes.Laparoscopic liver resection was performed in 225 patients and OLR in 291. In patients who underwent minor hepatectomy, LLR associated with a shorter duration of operation time (200 vs 220 minutes; P < 0.001), less blood loss (100 vs 225 mL; P < 0.001), lower transfusion rate (3.0% vs 12.0%; P = 0.012), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 7 days; P < 0.001) compared with OLR. Dietary recovery was relatively fast in the group of LLR, but there were no significant differences in hepatic inflow occlusion rate, complication rate, and transfusion volume. Patients who received major hepatectomy had a longer duration of operation (240 vs 230 minutes; P < 0.001), less blood loss (200 vs 400 mL; P < 0.001), lower transfusion rate (4.8% vs 16.5%; P = 0.002), lower hepatic inflow occlusion rate (68.3% vs 91.7%; P < 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6 vs 8 days; P < 0.001). Complication rate (P = 0.366) and transfusion volume (P = 0.308) did not differ between groups.Laparoscopic liver resection is a feasible and safe alternative to OLR for HCC when performed by a surgeon experienced with the relevant surgical techniques, associated with less blood loss, lower transfusion rate, a rapid return to a normal diet, and shorter postoperative hospital stay with no compromise in complications. Further, long-term follow-up should be acquired for adequate evaluation for survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.