Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28328798›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

Body mass index and the risk of low bone mass-related fractures in women compared with men: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Bing-Yan Xiang, Wei Huang, Guo-Qi Zhou, Ning Hu, Hong Chen, Cheng Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Socio-economic inequalities in fragility fracture incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 61 observational studies.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. A Modeling Study for Hip Fracture Rates in Romania.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Association between socioeconomic deprivation and bone health status in the UK biobank cohort participants.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bing-Yan XiangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Department of Respiratory Medicine, Three Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Guizhou, China.
Wei Huang
Guo-Qi Zhou
Ning Hu
Hong Chen
Cheng Chen
Chongqing Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBody mass index (BMI) is inconsistently associated with the progression of low bone mass-related fractures. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the relationship between BMI and the risk of fracture in men and women separately. Furthermore, we analyzed the association between BMI and fracture risk in women compared with men.

methodsPubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to November 2015 to identify prospective cohort studies of low bone mass-related fractures. Prospective cohort studies that reported effect estimates of fracture risk for different BMI categories compared to normal weight were included. Relative risk (RR) and the ratio of relative risk (RRR) were calculated using a random-effect model to measure the relationship between BMI and fracture risk.

resultsWe analyzed 37 cohorts (32 articles), which included a total of 506,004 women and 118,372 men; overall, 38,200 incident cases were reported. Overall, a lower BMI was not associated with fracture risk in men (RR: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-2.26; P = 0.051) or women (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.97-1.62; P = 0.083). Although a higher BMI might play a beneficial impact in men (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93; P = 0.003), it has little effect in women (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.11; P = 0.343). In addition, an increase in BMI by 5 kg/m decreased the risk of fractures in men (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98; P = 0.017) and women (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.89; P < 0.001). Finally, there was no evidence of a sex difference in the RR for fractures between participants with different BMI categories compared with those with normal BMI. Finally, gender did not affect the risk of fracture for any category of BMI values.

conclusionHigher BMI may affect the risk of fractures regardless of the sex. This association may be due to the interaction between the participants' BMI and their bone mass density.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAge FactorsBone DensityFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleOverweightProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsThinness

Identifiers

PMID28328798
PMCPMC5371435
OpenAlexW2601986366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.