Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28328668›Full record

ReviewJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association

Burn Wound Healing and Tissue Engineering.

Adam J Singer, Steven T Boyce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Harnessing therapeutic potential of bromelain and its nanoformulations: sojourn of pineapple from food to nanomedicine.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spincare System Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy in Treating Partial-Thickness Burns.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. HMedComm · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam J Singer*Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; and †Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.
Steven T Boyce

Funding

Novel peptide to inhibit burn injury progressionRC2AR059384 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI CLARK, RICHARD AUGUST, SINGER, ADAM JOHN · 2009 to 2010
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS RC2 AR059384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016 the American Burn Association held a State of the Science conference to help identify burn research priorities for the next decade. The current paper summarizes the work of the sub-committee on Burn Wound Healing and Tissue Engineering. We first present the priorities in wound healing research over the next 10 years. We then summarize the current state of the science related to burn wound healing and tissue engineering including determination of burn depth, limiting burn injury progression, eschar removal, management of microbial contamination and wound infection, measuring wound closure, accelerating wound healing and durable wound closure, and skin substitutes and tissue engineering. Finally, a summary of the round table discussion is presented.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringBurnsDisease ProgressionHumansSkin, ArtificialSkin TransplantationWound HealingWound Infection

Identifiers

PMID28328668
PMCPMC5461657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.