Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28328651›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2017

Quantifying the Mortality Impact of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the ICU.

Lior Fuchs, Matthew Anstey, Mengling Feng, Ronen Toledano, Slava Kogan, Michael D Howell, Peter Clardy, Leo Celi, Daniel Talmor, Victor Novack

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characteristics and Outcomes of Ethics Consultations on a Comprehensive Cancer Center's Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Service.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2018
    Article
  14. Accurate and interpretable intensive care risk adjustment for fused clinical data with generalized additive models.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lior Fuchs1Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. 2Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3Intensive Care Unit, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia. 4The Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. 5Institute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore. 6Center for Quality and the Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 7Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Matthew Anstey
Mengling Feng
Ronen Toledano
Slava Kogan
Michael D Howell
Peter Clardy
Leo Celi
Daniel Talmor
Victor Novack
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGHarvard University · US

Funding

Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe quantified the 28-day mortality effect of preexisting do-not-resuscitate orders in ICUs.

designLongitudinal, retrospective study of patients admitted to five ICUs at a tertiary university medical center (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, BIDMC, Boston, MA) between 2001 and 2008.

interventionNone. PATIENTS: Two cohorts were defined: patients with do not resuscitate advance directives on day 1 of ICU admission and a control group comprising patients with no limitations of level of care on ICU day 1 (full code). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe primary outcome was mortality at 28 days after ICU admission. Of 19,007 ICU patients, 1,239 patients (6.5%) had a do-not-resuscitate order on the first day of ICU admission and survived 48 hours in the ICU. We matched those do-not-resuscitate patients with 2,402 patients with full-code status. Twenty-eight day and 1-year mortality were both significantly higher in the do-not-resuscitate group (33.9% vs 18.4% and 60.7% vs 40.2%; p < 0.001, respectively).

conclusionDo-not-resuscitate status is an independent risk factor for ICU mortality. This may reflect severity of illness not captured by other clinical factors, but the perceptions of the treating team related to do-not-resuscitate status could also be causally responsible for increased mortality in patients with do-not-resuscitate status.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityResuscitation OrdersAcademic Medical CentersAgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID28328651
PMCPMC5679223
OpenAlexW2600524392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.