Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28328004›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2017

RED-ML: a novel, effective RNA editing detection method based on machine learning.

Heng Xiong, Dongbing Liu, Qiye Li, Mengyue Lei, Liqin Xu, Liang Wu, Zongji Wang, Shancheng Ren, Wangsheng Li, Min Xia and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The role of ADAR1 through and beyond its editing activity in cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Benchmarking RNA Editing Detection Tools.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Heng XiongBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Dongbing LiuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Qiye LiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Mengyue LeiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Liqin XuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Liang WuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Zongji WangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Shancheng RenDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Wangsheng LiBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Min XiaBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Lihua LuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Haorong LuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Yong HouBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Shida ZhuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Xin LiuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Yinghao SunDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Jian WangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Huanming YangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Kui WuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Xun XuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Leo J LeeBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
BGI Group (China) · CNChina National GeneBank · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advancement of second generation sequencing techniques, our ability to detect and quantify RNA editing on a global scale has been vastly improved. As a result, RNA editing is now being studied under a growing number of biological conditions so that its biochemical mechanisms and functional roles can be further understood. However, a major barrier that prevents RNA editing from being a routine RNA-seq analysis, similar to gene expression and splicing analysis, for example, is the lack of user-friendly and effective computational tools. Based on years of experience of analyzing RNA editing using diverse RNA-seq datasets, we have developed a software tool, RED-ML: RNA Editing Detection based on Machine learning (pronounced as "red ML"). The input to RED-ML can be as simple as a single BAM file, while it can also take advantage of matched genomic variant information when available. The output not only contains detected RNA editing sites, but also a confidence score to facilitate downstream filtering. We have carefully designed validation experiments and performed extensive comparison and analysis to show the efficiency and effectiveness of RED-ML under different conditions, and it can accurately detect novel RNA editing sites without relying on curated RNA editing databases. We have also made this tool freely available via GitHub <https://github.com/BGIRED/RED-ML>. We have developed a highly accurate, speedy and general-purpose tool for RNA editing detection using RNA-seq data. With the availability of RED-ML, it is now possible to conveniently make RNA editing a routine analysis of RNA-seq. We believe this can greatly benefit the RNA editing research community and has profound impact to accelerate our understanding of this intriguing posttranscriptional modification process.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRNA EditingSoftwareHumansMaleSequence Analysis, RNAA-to-I editingmachine learningposttranscriptional modificationRNA editingRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID28328004
PMCPMC5467039
OpenAlexW2592740179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.