ArticleGigaScience2017
MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
Article in GigaScience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of M and E protein mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants on reduced antibody binding and increased structural stability: a bioinformatics study (2021-2023).BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Uncovering DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV in Urban Wastewater in Brazil Through Genomic and Molecular Screening.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Development of a quantitative metagenomic approach to establish quantitative limits and its application to viruses.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Multi-platform metagenomic characterization of the microbial community during spontaneous cacao fermentation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Viral genome sequencing methods: benefits and pitfalls of current approaches.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024Review
- Advancing metagenome-assembled genome-based pathogen identification: unraveling the power of long-read assembly algorithms in Oxford Nanopore sequencing.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Review
- Current and Future Technologies for the Detection of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Diagnostics and analysis of SARS-CoV-2: current status, recent advances, challenges and perspectives.Chemical science · 2023Review
- Improved species level bacterial characterization from rhizosphere soil of wilt infected Punica granatum.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Characterization and simulation of metagenomic nanopore sequencing data with Meta-NanoSim.GigaScience · 2023Article
- Unveiling the Human Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiome: The Past, Present, and Future of Metagenomics.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Benchmarking assembly free nanopore read mappers to classify complex millipede gut microbiota via Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technology.Journal of biological methods · 2023Article
- Portable nanopore-sequencing technology: Trends in development and applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- High-resolution phylogenetic and population genetic analysis of microbial communities with RoC-ITS.ISME communications · 2022Article
- A preliminary metagenomics study of bacteria present in the dirt of Swiftlet farmhouses based on nitrite levels in edible bird's nest on Sumatera Island, Indonesia.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Article
- Functional characterization of prokaryotic dark matter: the road so far and what lies ahead.Current research in microbial sciences · 2022Review
- Comparable outcomes from long and short read random sequencing of total RNA for detection of pathogens in chicken respiratory samples.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- NOMAD: metagenomic characterisation of the viral pathogen composition in outbreaks of non-malaria acute febrile illness cases.Open research Africa · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental metagenomic analysis is typically accomplished by assigning taxonomy and/or function from whole genome sequencing or 16S amplicon sequences. Both of these approaches are limited, however, by read length, among other technical and biological factors. A nanopore-based sequencing platform, MinION™, produces reads that are ≥1 × 104 bp in length, potentially providing for more precise assignment, thereby alleviating some of the limitations inherent in determining metagenome composition from short reads. We tested the ability of sequence data produced by MinION (R7.3 flow cells) to correctly assign taxonomy in single bacterial species runs and in three types of low-complexity synthetic communities: a mixture of DNA using equal mass from four species, a community with one relatively rare (1%) and three abundant (33% each) components, and a mixture of genomic DNA from 20 bacterial strains of staggered representation. Taxonomic composition of the low-complexity communities was assessed by analyzing the MinION sequence data with three different bioinformatic approaches: Kraken, MG-RAST, and One Codex. Results: Long read sequences generated from libraries prepared from single strains using the version 5 kit and chemistry, run on the original MinION device, yielded as few as 224 to as many as 3497 bidirectional high-quality (2D) reads with an average overall study length of 6000 bp. For the single-strain analyses, assignment of reads to the correct genus by different methods ranged from 53.1% to 99.5%, assignment to the correct species ranged from 23.9% to 99.5%, and the majority of misassigned reads were to closely related organisms. A synthetic metagenome sequenced with the same setup yielded 714 high quality 2D reads of approximately 5500 bp that were up to 98% correctly assigned to the species level. Synthetic metagenome MinION libraries generated using version 6 kit and chemistry yielded from 899 to 3497 2D reads with lengths averaging 5700 bp with up to 98% assignment accuracy at the species level. The observed community proportions for “equal” and “rare” synthetic libraries were close to the known proportions, deviating from 0.1% to 10% across all tests. For a 20-species mock community with staggered contributions, a sequencing run detected all but 3 species (each included at <0.05% of DNA in the total mixture), 91% of reads were assigned to the correct species, 93% of reads were assigned to the correct genus, and >99% of reads were assigned to the correct family. Conclusions: At the current level of output and sequence quality (just under 4 × 103 2D reads for a synthetic metagenome), MinION sequencing followed by Kraken or One Codex analysis has the potential to provide rapid and accurate metagenomic analysis where the consortium is comprised of a limited number of taxa. Important considerations noted in this study included: high sensitivity of the MinION platform to the quality of input DNA, high variability of sequencing results across libraries and flow cells, and relatively small numbers of 2D reads per analysis limit. Together, these limited detection of very rare components of the microbial consortia, and would likely limit the utility of MinION for the sequencing of high-complexity metagenomic communities where thousands of taxa are expected. Furthermore, the limitations of the currently available data analysis tools suggest there is considerable room for improvement in the analytical approaches for the characterization of microbial communities using long reads. Nevertheless, the fact that the accurate taxonomic assignment of high-quality reads generated by MinION is approaching 99.5% and, in most cases, the inferred community structure mirrors the known proportions of a synthetic mixture warrants further exploration of practical application to environmental metagenomics as the platform continues to develop and improve. With further improvement in sequence throughput and error rate reduction, this platform shows great promise for precise real-time analysis of the composition and structure of more complex microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.