Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28327133›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Improved knee biomechanics among patients reporting a good outcome in knee-related quality of life one year after total knee arthroplasty.

Josefine E Naili, Per Wretenberg, Viktor Lindgren, Maura D Iversen, Margareta Hedström, Eva W Broström

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The "Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Josefine E NailiDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, MotorikLab, Q2:07, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. josefine.naili@ki.se.
Per WretenbergDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University and Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Viktor LindgrenDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, L1:00, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maura D IversenDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, MotorikLab, Q2:07, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Margareta HedströmDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, K54, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva W BroströmDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, MotorikLab, Q2:07, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEÖrebro University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not well understood why one in five patients report poor outcomes following knee arthroplasty. This study evaluated changes in knee biomechanics, and perceived pain among patients reporting either a good or a poor outcome in knee-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty.

methodsTwenty-eight patients (mean age 66 (SD 7) years) were included in this prospective study. Within one month of knee arthroplasty and one year after surgery, patients underwent three-dimensional (3D) gait analysis, completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and rated perceived pain using a visual analogue scale. A "good outcome" was defined as a change greater than the minimally detectable change in the KOOS knee-related quality of life, and a "poor outcome" was defined as change below the minimally detectable change. Nineteen patients (68%) were classified as having a good outcome. Groups were analyzed separately and knee biomechanics were compared using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Differences in pain between groups were evaluated using Mann Whitney U test.

resultsPatients classified as having a good outcome improved significantly in most knee gait biomechanical outcomes including increased knee flexion-extension range, reduced peak varus angle, increased peak flexion moment, and reduced peak valgus moment. The good outcome group also displayed a significant increase in walking speed, a reduction (normalization) of stance phase duration (% of gait cycle) and increased passive knee extension. Whereas, the only change in knee biomechanics, one year after surgery, for patients classified as having a poor outcome was a significant reduction in peak varus angle. No differences in pain postoperatively were found between groups.

conclusionPatients reporting a good outcome in knee-related quality of life improved in knee biomechanics during gait, while patients reporting a poor outcome, despite similar reduction in pain, remained unchanged in knee biomechanics one year after total knee arthroplasty. With regards to surgeon-controlled biomechanical factors, surgery may most successfully address frontal plane knee alignment. However, achieving a good outcome in patient-reported knee-related quality of life may be related to dynamic improvements in the sagittal plane.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeQuality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalysis of VarianceArthralgiaBiomechanical PhenomenaDisability EvaluationFemaleGaitHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceBiomechanicsFunctionGaitJoint replacementKneeOsteoarthritisQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID28327133
PMCPMC5361836
OpenAlexW2598678782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.