Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28327122›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2017

Midodrine as adjunctive support for treatment of refractory hypotension in the intensive care unit: a multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled trial (the MIDAS trial).

Matthew H Anstey, Bradley Wibrow, Tharusan Thevathasan, Brigit Roberts, Khushi Chhangani, Pauline Yeung Ng, Alexander Levine, Alan DiBiasio, Todd Sarge, Matthias Eikermann

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01531959 phase3completednot on this map

Midodrine for the Treatment of Refractory Hypotension in Patients Otherwise Ready for Discharge From the ICU

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2012 to 2019Enrolled139ConditionsHypotension, Critical IllnessArmsMidodrine, Placebo
NCT03911817 phase4completednot on this map

Impact of Midodrine Administration on the Clinical Outcome of Septic Shock Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsMidodrine
NCT04440085 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Randomized case-controlled trial assessing midodrine (gutron®) in postoperative vasoplegic patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorBürgerspital SolothurnRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsVasoplegic Syndrome, Sirs Due to Noninfectious Process Without Organ Dysfunction, Orthostatic HypotensionArmsMidodrine Hydrochloride, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Midodrine use in critically ill patients: a narrative review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthew H AnsteySir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Bradley WibrowSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Tharusan ThevathasanDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Brigit RobertsSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Khushi ChhanganiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Pauline Yeung NgDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Alexander LevineDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, University of Saint Joseph, Hartford, CT, USA.
Alan DiBiasioDepartment of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Todd SargeDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Matthias EikermannDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. meikermann@partners.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1268-0106
Harvard University · USThe University of Western Australia · AUBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUUniversity of Saint Joseph · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) are often treated with intravenous (IV) vasopressors. Persistent hypotension and dependence on IV vasopressors in otherwise resuscitated patients lead to delay in discharge from ICU. Midodrine is an oral alpha-1 adrenergic agonist approved for treatment of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. This trial aims to evaluate whether oral administration of midodrine is an effective adjunct to standard therapy to reduce the duration of IV vasopressor treatment, and allow earlier discharge from ICU and hospital.

methodsThe MIDAS trial is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial being conducted in the USA and Australia. We are targeting 120 patients. Adult patients admitted to the ICU who are resuscitated and otherwise stable on low dose IV vasopressors for at least 24 h will be considered for recruitment. Participants will be randomized to receive midodrine (20 mg) or placebo three times a day, in addition to standard care. The primary outcome is time (hours) from initiation of midodrine or placebo to discontinuation of IV vasopressors. Secondary outcomes include time (hours) from ICU admission to discharge readiness, ICU length of stay (LOS) (days), hospital LOS (days), rates of ICU readmission, and rates of adverse events related to midodrine administration. DISCUSSION: Midodrine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of symptomatic orthostatic hypotension. In August 2010, FDA proposed to withdraw approval of midodrine because of lack of studies that verify the clinical benefit of the drug. We obtained Investigational New Drug (IND 113,330) approval to study its effects in critically ill patients who require IV vasopressors but are otherwise ready for discharge from the ICU. A pilot observational study in a cohort of surgical ICU patients showed that the rate of decline in vasopressor requirements increased after initiation of midodrine treatment. We hypothesize that midodrine administration is effective to wean IV vasopressors and shorten ICU and hospital LOS. This trial may have significant implications on lowering costs of hospital care and obtaining FDA approval for new indications for midodrine.

trial registrationThis study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 02/09/2012 (NCT01531959).

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AgonistsAdultDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansHypotension, OrthostaticIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMidodrinePatient DischargeVasoconstrictor AgentsAdrenergic alpha-1 Receptor AgonistsMidodrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAlpha adrenergic agonistHigh dependency unitHypotensionIntensive care unitMidodrineVasopressor

Identifiers

PMID28327122
PMCPMC5361788
OpenAlexW2601599603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.