Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28327116›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2017

A tailored online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: the iCAN Plan 4 Safety randomized controlled trial protocol.

Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, Colleen Varcoe, Kelly Scott-Storey, Judith Wuest, James Case, Leanne M Currie, Nancy Glass, Marilyn Hodgins, Harriet MacMillan, Nancy Perrin and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02258841 nacompletednot on this map

Testing an Internet-based Safety Decision Aid for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence

TypeinterventionalSponsorWestern University, CanadaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled462ConditionsDomestic ViolenceArmsSetting Priorities for Safety, Danger Assessment, Personalized Action Plan, General risk and safety information, Basic Emergency Safety Plan
NCT04775160 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Intervention for Secondary Prevention of Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior: a Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez DíazRan2022 to 2025Enrolled220ConditionsSuicideArmsSmartSafe
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marilyn Ford-GilboeArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, FNB 2302, 1151 Richmond St., London, ON, NBA 5C1, Canada. mfordg@uwo.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-8748
Colleen VarcoeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kelly Scott-StoreyFaculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Judith WuestFaculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
James CaseSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leanne M CurrieSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Nancy GlassSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marilyn HodginsFaculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Harriet MacMillanDepartments of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neuroscience, and Pediatrics, Offord Center for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Nancy PerrinSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
C Nadine WathenFaculty of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of New Brunswick · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAWestern University · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) threatens the safety and health of women worldwide. Safety planning is a widely recommended, evidence-based intervention for women experiencing IPV, yet fewer than 1 in 5 Canadian women access safety planning through domestic violence services. Rural, Indigenous, racialized, and immigrant women, those who prioritize their privacy, and/or women who have partners other than men, face unique safety risks and access barriers. Online IPV interventions tailored to the unique features of women's lives, and to maximize choice and control, have potential to reduce access barriers, and improve fit and inclusiveness, maximizing effectiveness of these interventions for diverse groups. METHODS/

designIn this double blind randomized controlled trial, 450 Canadian women who have experienced IPV in the previous 6 months will be randomized to either a tailored, interactive online safety and health intervention (iCAN Plan 4 Safety) or general online safety information (usual care). iCAN engages women in activities designed to increase their awareness of safety risks, reflect on their plans for their relationships and priorities, and create a personalize action plan of strategies and resources for addressing their safety and health concerns. Self-reported outcome measures will be collected at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-baseline. Primary outcomes are depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, Revised) and PTSD Symptoms (PTSD Checklist, Civilian Version). Secondary outcomes include helpful safety actions, safety planning self-efficacy, mastery, and decisional conflict. In-depth qualitative interviews with approximately 60 women who have completed the trial and website utilization data will be used to explore women's engagement with the intervention and processes of change. DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute timely evidence about the effectiveness of online safety and health interventions appropriate for diverse life contexts. If effective, iCAN could be readily adopted by health and social services and/or accessed by women to work through options independently. This study will produce contextualized knowledge about how women engage with the intervention; its strengths and weaknesses; whether specific groups benefit more than others; and the processes explaining any positive outcomes. Such information is critical for effective scale up of any complex intervention.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ID NCT02258841 (Registered on Oct 2, 2014).

Indexed as

CounselingAdultCanadaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInternetIntimate Partner ViolenceResearch DesignSafetySexual PartnersTreatment OutcomeWomen's Health ServicesYoung AdultComputerized decision supporte-healthIntimate partner violence against womenMasteryMental healthOnline interventionsPublic health informaticsRandomized controlled trialSafety planningSelf-efficacyTechnology

Identifiers

PMID28327116
PMCPMC5360053
OpenAlexW2598218272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.