Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28326926›Full record

ArticleMolecular pain2017

Potential protein biomarkers for burning mouth syndrome discovered by quantitative proteomics.

Eoon Hye Ji, Cynthia Diep, Tong Liu, Hong Li, Robert Merrill, Diana Messadi, Shen Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Metabolomics of Oral/Head and Neck Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Protein Signature in Saliva of Temporomandibular Disorders Myalgia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Biomarkers in orofacial pain conditions: A narrative review.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eoon Hye Ji1 School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cynthia Diep1 School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Tong Liu2 Center for Advanced Proteomics Research, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Hong Li2 Center for Advanced Proteomics Research, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Robert Merrill1 School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Diana Messadi1 School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Shen Hu1 School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USRutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by severe burning sensation in normal looking oral mucosa. Diagnosis of BMS remains to be a challenge to oral healthcare professionals because the method for definite diagnosis is still uncertain. In this study, a quantitative saliva proteomic analysis was performed in order to identify target proteins in BMS patients' saliva that may be used as biomarkers for simple, non-invasive detection of the disease. By using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation labeling and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to quantify 1130 saliva proteins between BMS patients and healthy control subjects, we found that 50 proteins were significantly changed in the BMS patients when compared to the healthy control subjects ( p ≤ 0.05, 39 up-regulated and 11 down-regulated). Four candidates, alpha-enolase, interleukin-18 (IL-18), kallikrein-13 (KLK13), and cathepsin G, were selected for further validation. Based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measurements, three potential biomarkers, alpha-enolase, IL-18, and KLK13, were successfully validated. The fold changes for alpha-enolase, IL-18, and KLK13 were determined as 3.6, 2.9, and 2.2 (burning mouth syndrome vs. control), and corresponding receiver operating characteristic values were determined as 0.78, 0.83, and 0.68, respectively. Our findings indicate that testing of the identified protein biomarkers in saliva might be a valuable clinical tool for BMS detection. Further validation studies of the identified biomarkers or additional candidate biomarkers are needed to achieve a multi-marker prediction model for improved detection of BMS with high sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBurning Mouth SyndromeCathepsin GEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansInterleukin-18KallikreinsMalePain MeasurementPhosphopyruvate HydrataseProteomicsROC CurveSalivaBiomarkersCathepsin GInterleukin-18KallikreinsKLK13 protein, humanPhosphopyruvate HydratasebiomarkersBurning mouth syndromeisobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitationliquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometryorofacial painquantitative proteomics

Identifiers

PMID28326926
PMCPMC5302177
OpenAlexW2573069742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.